Mod Edit... Also see
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10557 for a similar chart from Monaco 2011
- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10557 for a similar chart from Monaco 2011Heh, so the traditional wisdom that you can make up both straights in the middle sector was off – he managed to make up the kemel straight, but not blanchimont.raymondu999 wrote:Interesting data overlay that Lewis Hamilton has posted on Instagram: http://instagram.com/p/PETRF0r08G/
that´s a nice little plot...hamsy feels he needs to share...raymondu999 wrote:Interesting data overlay that Lewis Hamilton has posted on Instagram: http://instagram.com/p/PETRF0r08G/
I think if you plotted wing angle vs laptime, you'd get a "local minima" where the compromise is spot on, but iven the track layout it's quite difficult - so you always err for slightly too much or too little wing. I think Lewis just had too much wing. If he had maybe less than what he has, it could still be that he could have matched Jenson's time.beelsebob wrote:Heh, so the traditional wisdom that you can make up both straights in the middle sector was off – he managed to make up the kemel straight, but not blanchimont.raymondu999 wrote:Interesting data overlay that Lewis Hamilton has posted on Instagram: http://instagram.com/p/PETRF0r08G/
So the new wing gained 0.6 on sector 1 and 0.5 in sector 3, that is a huge development with their rear wing. Anyone see how much time was lost in the middle sector with the new wing going by the telemetry?Interesting data overlay that Lewis Hamilton has posted on Instagram: http://instagram.com/p/PETRF0r08G/
While the pic remains on instagram, the tweet has been deleted. That's 3 tweets in the last 2 days that a tweet from him has disappeared.marcush. wrote:that´s a nice little plot...hamsy feels he needs to share...raymondu999 wrote:Interesting data overlay that Lewis Hamilton has posted on Instagram: http://instagram.com/p/PETRF0r08G/
While he quotes .6 and .5, I'm not sure that's correct. Look at the axis labels on the far left - he doesn't lose even .5 in S1, and less again in S3matt_b wrote:So the new wing gained 0.6 on sector 1 and 0.5 in sector 3, that is a huge development with their rear wing. Anyone see how much time was lost in the middle sector with the new wing going by the telemetry?
Huh? I couldn't see a scale on the trace, but he ended the lap 0.8 down, and the trace shows him *almost* caught up with button at the end of S2, so that tells you the scale roughly... Given that scale, he certainly does lose the numbers he quoted – 0.6 down kemmel, gained 0.3-0.4 again in S2, and then lost it and more down through blanchimont.raymondu999 wrote:While the pic remains on instagram, the tweet has been deleted. That's 3 tweets in the last 2 days that a tweet from him has disappeared.marcush. wrote:that´s a nice little plot...hamsy feels he needs to share...raymondu999 wrote:Interesting data overlay that Lewis Hamilton has posted on Instagram: http://instagram.com/p/PETRF0r08G/
While he quotes .6 and .5, I'm not sure that's correct. Look at the axis labels on the far left - he doesn't lose even .5 in S1, and less again in S3matt_b wrote:So the new wing gained 0.6 on sector 1 and 0.5 in sector 3, that is a huge development with their rear wing. Anyone see how much time was lost in the middle sector with the new wing going by the telemetry?
Right, but that scale can't be the relevant one, because the trace doesn't end at -0.821.raymondu999 wrote:Look on the far left, where the time trace is. There are labels there. -0.1, -0.5 and -0.9 - which is the time delta
CMSMJ1 wrote:Did anyone keep a copy of that trace? It has now been removed
Which blips would these be? Not seeing any.beelsebob wrote:The interesting to me to see the little blips in torque in the breaking zones.