How does the wiring relate to pitot tubes behind the diffuser? Why would the wiring need to run up the endplate so high?Forza wrote:Wiring is there because they are running pitot tube sensors behind the diffuser.
How does the wiring relate to pitot tubes behind the diffuser? Why would the wiring need to run up the endplate so high?Forza wrote:Wiring is there because they are running pitot tube sensors behind the diffuser.
Ah, i see. Maybe be some wishful thinking on my part (hoping for a DDRS implementation). I do think the endplate appears thicker than usual, but this could be a light/reflection thing.Owen.C93 wrote:They run pressure sensors on the plane of the rear wing. Same as the floor.
Perhaps it's because they've had to put so many holes in the wing to fit the sensor rig that they didn't want to mess up their latest version. The sensors probably corrupt the airflow so a small aerodynamic diasadvantage might not matter. I guess they are testing the construction which is likely similar between the wings.Owen.C93 wrote:What's odd is that the front wing is from early pre-season before they updated it at the final test. Seems strange to run such an old wing.
Doubtful; how do they intend to get a DDRS solution for that car? (Think about the tubing).n smikle wrote:What about DDRS? looks sorta fishy the number of sensors.
Good spot, looking at other shots they used the updated wing without the new cascades for normal running.horse wrote:Thanks for the explanations about the sensor rig.
Perhaps it's because they've had to put so many holes in the wing to fit the sensor rig that they didn't want to mess up their latest version. The sensors probably corrupt the airflow so a small aerodynamic diasadvantage might not matter. I guess they are testing the construction which is likely similar between the wings.Owen.C93 wrote:What's odd is that the front wing is from early pre-season before they updated it at the final test. Seems strange to run such an old wing.
You are right.zyphro wrote:Doubtful; how do they intend to get a DDRS solution for that car? (Think about the tubing).n smikle wrote:What about DDRS? looks sorta fishy the number of sensors.
Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm an amateur.
Maybe they don't want the test drivers wiping the new wings off in an accident due to being rusty?Owen.C93 wrote:Good spot, looking at other shots they used the updated wing without the new cascades for normal running.horse wrote:Thanks for the explanations about the sensor rig.
Perhaps it's because they've had to put so many holes in the wing to fit the sensor rig that they didn't want to mess up their latest version. The sensors probably corrupt the airflow so a small aerodynamic diasadvantage might not matter. I guess they are testing the construction which is likely similar between the wings.Owen.C93 wrote:What's odd is that the front wing is from early pre-season before they updated it at the final test. Seems strange to run such an old wing.