WilliamsF1 wrote:Facts
Why is this being a problem on a 6th generation K-ERS system? Does the doubling of power output from 80 to 160 hp have a significant difference in architecture that previous experiences were irrelevant?
PS I am assuming a change in design every year since 2010
Well Honda bailed on F1 at the end of '08 just before KERS was introduced, we know they did the design work for the original KERS but never raced with it. Even if they have been ticking over with a design since then this is the 1st generation of KERS they have actually had to use in the real world. Whereas in that same time Renault, Merc and Ferrari have spent 6 years designing, developing, building and racing KERS units.
That is a
huge disadvantage. This is why I have never been particularly confident in Honda making any sort of challenge with their PU, certainly for 2-3 years anyway. The amount of experience that has been gathered by the other 3 engine makers over the last 6 years is vast and money just cant buy that.... well not if you set-up in Japan and struggle to poach rivals staff. I know that they have a couple of big names to come up with the big ideas but you need the guys on the CAD boxes and CNC machines to be able to fire out designs for the nuts and bolts and bits and bobs and seals (quite literally) of the engine and get them made without these sort of niggles, and this comes with experience.
It may only be an MGUK seal but it has wasted a huge amount of their very limited test time, they may have the best PU out there but if they cant run at full power because a small seal doesn't work its all irrelevant.
I'm not trying to run Honda down, I'm impressed with the fact that they have made it to the first test and got running but I think the task is much bigger than people think.