That's OK, it should be possible to defend. Overtaking perhaps should be hard rather than very easy?
I said it before the race, not after
Kinda like the old days with a 2:1 power to weight ratio, where the guts of the driver was the one that decided maximum speed instead of the car limitations. Cars that were constantly trying to kill the driver
Decision making has always been inconsistent, but the 1st lap defenses or offences have always been forgiven for so long as there is no damage to any car. Sainz could have had his front wing damaged like Lando's if he would have gone ahead. On top of that, he would have got punished like Max got in Brazil last year, although Sainz was not ahead like Max was.JordanMugen wrote: ↑04 Jun 2023, 21:29Sainz could have forced the issue so that he and Verstapen collided. I'm not sure why Sainz backed out of it? (Preservation? Lack of belief of being able to go for the win?)
As per the rules, if Tsunoda did not leave a car's width on the outside of the corner then absolutely Verstappen did not either.
Yes. Unlimited and analog, so the drivers are almost always using it between 1 and 100%.langedweil wrote: ↑05 Jun 2023, 01:28Kinda like the old days with a 2:1 power to weight ratio, where the guts of the driver was the one that decided maximum speed instead of the car limitations. Cars that were constantly trying to kill the driver
But that could get bloody .. but way more Gladiator-esque.
In what units?
Yeah, I´m just like you. I don´t like wet QLFs, much prefer to see full performance on the dry surface. Races are better when wet though.
I wonder if the braking is more for rotation, or even some recharge? Sainz still has the throttle engaged when he does it so he's not actually trying to slow down.Artur Craft wrote: ↑05 Jun 2023, 05:50Yeah, I´m just like you. I don´t like wet QLFs, much prefer to see full performance on the dry surface. Races are better when wet though.
BTW, Ferrari needs to brake on T3, Campsa and the last corner :
Make that Eliminated