Andres125sx wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 10:24
search wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 10:13
TNTHead wrote: ↑06 Nov 2023, 09:07
They published this:
But that doesn't say anything. Possibly add fuel to the fire that something is going on. In the comments a screenshot from the distance, they look closer than a car length.
so you really think they rigged the photo finish?!
It looks absolutely the same from Perez' onboard.
https://i.imgur.com/jmFMZQs.png
Except that is not a photo finish, but a render.
Asphalt is not that colorful, and those horizontal lines, drawn to show movement, are completely artificial
Probably drawn with real data, but that is not a photo finish
No, it's a real image, could be called "sureal" as finish line camera equipment has always produced such images. Effectively it "inverts" our conventional thinking of photography by moving the camera recording device/media with the moving subject (while the device itself stays still and at 90 degree to subject).....making it look static....while letting the track surface move in relation to that image device, colour purity of static surface is sacrificed often to facilitate correct exposure of moving target.
It used to be done with film cameras by moving the film laterally at the same speed as target, but likely electronic sampling now from a static image plane device.
Looks distorted, but is a true image. A specialised area of imaging thats pretty unique.