Good post!!rb88 wrote: ↑15 Dec 2021, 19:40Well not against a team, but certainly vs. another driver - coincidentally Hamilton's hero - Ayrton Senna. What the FIA did under leadership of Jean-Marie Balestre, it's deja-vu for me. He didn't want Senna to win - a Frenchman at the helm of a French organisation, making sure the French driver, Alain Prost, won. Even though it was clear by any standard that Prost forced a collision with Senna in Suzuka 1989 - and Senna was DISQUALIFIED from that race, losing him the championship in the process. FIA's reasoning? That he "Cut the course, and therefore did not respect the distance of the race". Ron Dennis defended Senna that year, showing with evidence that there was inconsistency in applied rules regarding escape roads. The FIA disregarded it, Mclaren did not take it any further than that.ringo wrote: ↑15 Dec 2021, 19:07I dont see why Bahrain is even being discussed.
No regulation was manipulated there. And to weaken the discussion. Track limit rules are in the name of fair competition. The director decides which turns are policed to foster equity in cars lapping the circuit. If he changes midway during the race its for all.
1. The race director did not rewrite rules in favour of any team. All cars could do what Lewis was doing there. Max could as well but maybe it was not the fastest for him.
2. Not acting on a rule is way different than recreating rules to setup a likely outcome that disadvantanged a competitor.
This did not happen in Bahrain. Masi did not see Lewis leading and twist a rule that disadvantaged Max but benefited Lewis in an irreversible and powerless way.
Max fans please stop grasping for straws for other instances. Nothing has happened in F1 like what happened on Sunday ever.
The closest thing was Max pushing off Lewis in Brazil.
You cannot find 1 example where a regulation was corrupted then implemented opportunistically to mislead 1 team's decision making and to provide an unfair advtantage to another team. It has never happened like this in F1 before.
The last time i can think of is Spa 2007 with Kimi and Hamilton where Lewis was robbed of a win and rules manipulated. And even then it was somewhat easier to digest because the rule was not changed in race. The event was completed and then the rule created after the fact. This was wrong and i still consider Hamilton having 1 more win back then.
Now it even makes it 2 wins that Hamilton has been robbed of by the FIA.
To add insult to injury, the very next year, at the title fight at the same circuit in Suzuka, the pole position slot was suddenly and misteriously changed sides, off the normal racing line - to give Senna a disadvantage, clearly. Senna then took it upon himself to crash Prost out once he saw Prost pulling away from what was his side of the grid really, which I really do not blame him for, at all. He was f***** over once, and wasn't going to let the FIA f***** him over twice.
This is that same situation ALL OVER AGAIN. With Mercedes today not showing up for pre-event ceremonies at the FIA Gala, I really do hope Merc stick it to the FIA hard, hopefully going as far to go to the CAS if necessary, to once and for all end this for any driver that may experience this kind of discrimination against his character ever again, because that is what it is.
edit: I recommend you all to watch the documentary "Senna", to see this whole episode played out in very good detail. Then come back and tell me this isn't the exact same thing.
Yes the sport is not immune to manipulation.
I think Lewis comes of a greater legend for this whole situation.
In fact it has allowed him to be greater than the sport itself.
Going forward every journo or commentator that speaks to him or about him will have this farce in the back of their minds.
This is also somewhat adding to the lore of Mercedes AMG as well.
Jesse Owens in the 1936 Olympics of Nazi Germany comes to mind. He is still remembered to this day and what he symbolized.