Not surprising. Pedro is a reliable source when it comes to Alonso's first impression of the car.
Not surprising. Pedro is a reliable source when it comes to Alonso's first impression of the car.
The top 3 over the last decade and more have done it by spending double the midfield. Easy to build the better mousetrap when you can pay people more and pay more people.
Much of the 2022 cars were designed when there was no cap. Maybe in 2-3 years things will even out, but right now Merc, RB, and Ferrari still have by far and away the best facilities and simulation tools on the grid. The budget cap wasn’t going to make an instant impact on relative team performance.diffuser wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 08:05The top 3 over the last decade and more have done it by spending double the midfield. Easy to build the better mousetrap when you can pay people more and pay more people.
Today's reality is that if you pay people more, you'll end up with a smaller workforce. With the exception of the three highest paid personnel that a team can exempt from the CAP, salaries are counted towards the CAP. I can't see Merc building a car that is so much faster, than let's say McLaren, now that Merc no longer has double the workforce.
Someone mentioned convergence might be playing a part. I'd have to agree with that. I have no Idea how that part will play out. What's certain is cars are very diverse this year. Some teams will hit performance walls caused by the design directions they have chosen and have to change direction at some point. When that is I don't know.
JPower wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 13:09Much of the 2022 cars were designed when there was no cap. Maybe in 2-3 years things will even out, but right now Merc, RB, and Ferrari still have by far and away the best facilities and simulation tools on the grid. The budget cap wasn’t going to make an instant impact on relative team performance.diffuser wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 08:05The top 3 over the last decade and more have done it by spending double the midfield. Easy to build the better mousetrap when you can pay people more and pay more people.
Today's reality is that if you pay people more, you'll end up with a smaller workforce. With the exception of the three highest paid personnel that a team can exempt from the CAP, salaries are counted towards the CAP. I can't see Merc building a car that is so much faster, than let's say McLaren, now that Merc no longer has double the workforce.
Someone mentioned convergence might be playing a part. I'd have to agree with that. I have no Idea how that part will play out. What's certain is cars are very diverse this year. Some teams will hit performance walls caused by the design directions they have chosen and have to change direction at some point. When that is I don't know.
Merc has 280Hrs RBR has 300 Fer has 320 McL has 340 Alp has 360 etc etc etc Haas has 460
Teams were doing R&D before the freeze.diffuser wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 14:48
Remember in 2020 they were banned from doing aero on the 2022 cars until jan 1 2021. That and they only finalised the regs in 2020.
The season hasn't even started yet and Horner is concerned about having to lay people off to stay under the CAP. He'll have a hell of a time gettting HAAS to sign off on that. Haas's budget is probably well below CAP, after just losing a chunk of it, doudt they're willing to give the teams with more money a bigger edge. Haas is probably thinikng to themselves..... Hmmm lets see if I can get more adversising money and take those people off your hands.
https://auto.hindustantimes.com/auto/ne ... %20season.
Alpine/Renault have Amazing facilities. They've just recently upgraded them. Think the wind tunnel was completed in 2018.JPower wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 20:06Teams were doing R&D before the freeze.diffuser wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 14:48
Remember in 2020 they were banned from doing aero on the 2022 cars until jan 1 2021. That and they only finalised the regs in 2020.
The season hasn't even started yet and Horner is concerned about having to lay people off to stay under the CAP. He'll have a hell of a time gettting HAAS to sign off on that. Haas's budget is probably well below CAP, after just losing a chunk of it, doudt they're willing to give the teams with more money a bigger edge. Haas is probably thinikng to themselves..... Hmmm lets see if I can get more adversising money and take those people off your hands.
https://auto.hindustantimes.com/auto/ne ... %20season.
Regardless, the cap doesn't cover the facilities and tools teams already had before the restriction. Merc/Red Bull/Ferrari have a significant advantage there and in general in house knowledge. You can't catch up to team that's spent $300+ million a year for a decade within one year.
Zak Brown has highlighted that point frequently and its why Aston and Alpine have also targeted 2023-2024 for championship contention.
If the facilities are great, then they are running out of excusesdiffuser wrote: ↑13 Mar 2022, 04:59Alpine/Renault have Amazing facilities. They've just recently upgraded them. Think the wind tunnel was completed in 2018.JPower wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 20:06Teams were doing R&D before the freeze.diffuser wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 14:48
Remember in 2020 they were banned from doing aero on the 2022 cars until jan 1 2021. That and they only finalised the regs in 2020.
The season hasn't even started yet and Horner is concerned about having to lay people off to stay under the CAP. He'll have a hell of a time gettting HAAS to sign off on that. Haas's budget is probably well below CAP, after just losing a chunk of it, doudt they're willing to give the teams with more money a bigger edge. Haas is probably thinikng to themselves..... Hmmm lets see if I can get more adversising money and take those people off your hands.
https://auto.hindustantimes.com/auto/ne ... %20season.
Regardless, the cap doesn't cover the facilities and tools teams already had before the restriction. Merc/Red Bull/Ferrari have a significant advantage there and in general in house knowledge. You can't catch up to team that's spent $300+ million a year for a decade within one year.
Zak Brown has highlighted that point frequently and its why Aston and Alpine have also targeted 2023-2024 for championship contention.
Hate to tell you this but 1 team wins, 9 teams have excuses.AR3-GP wrote: ↑13 Mar 2022, 06:42If the facilities are great, then they are running out of excusesdiffuser wrote: ↑13 Mar 2022, 04:59Alpine/Renault have Amazing facilities. They've just recently upgraded them. Think the wind tunnel was completed in 2018.JPower wrote: ↑12 Mar 2022, 20:06
Teams were doing R&D before the freeze.
Regardless, the cap doesn't cover the facilities and tools teams already had before the restriction. Merc/Red Bull/Ferrari have a significant advantage there and in general in house knowledge. You can't catch up to team that's spent $300+ million a year for a decade within one year.
Zak Brown has highlighted that point frequently and its why Aston and Alpine have also targeted 2023-2024 for championship contention.
Their sidepod approach is conservative but not far off what RBR are doing. Pictures show that those sidepods are completely empty. So they're strickly there to guide and sculpt the air.GoranF1 wrote: ↑13 Mar 2022, 13:11Alpine/Renault technical department that is now under Fry seem to have taken following aproach to 2022.
- agressive PU development (main focus)
- conservative aero development (focus on fast competition ideas copy in season)
- hoping Fry suspension and mechanical expetise to give early advantage
Again, you don't catch up to teams that have spent $300+ million per year for a decade straight in one year of a budget cap. Renault was not spending on that level.
I can only tell you what Palmer said on F1 TV yesterday. That's he's seen them and they're amazing.JPower wrote: ↑13 Mar 2022, 15:49Again, you don't catch up to teams that have spent $300+ million per year for a decade straight in one year of a budget cap. Renault was not spending on that level.
So no, I don't believe their facilities and institutional knowledge are on par with Mercedes/Ferrari/Red Bull until proven otherwise. If you do have proof they are, then Renault is the most underachieving team in the history of the sport.
OK, given their amazing facilities on par with the top teams of the past decade, you confirm that Renault has been the most underachieving team in F1 history correct?diffuser wrote: ↑13 Mar 2022, 17:36I can only tell you what Palmer said on F1 TV yesterday. That's he's seen them and they're amazing.JPower wrote: ↑13 Mar 2022, 15:49Again, you don't catch up to teams that have spent $300+ million per year for a decade straight in one year of a budget cap. Renault was not spending on that level.
So no, I don't believe their facilities and institutional knowledge are on par with Mercedes/Ferrari/Red Bull until proven otherwise. If you do have proof they are, then Renault is the most underachieving team in the history of the sport.
Institution knowledge is just people and when you have to let go 25% of your work force, that know how goes with them and is free to be shared with everyone and anyone. Also the CAP prevents you from being able to outbid all the other teams for personnel, you can only protect 3 people. Teams like Haas (11 weeks) have literally more than 4 full work weeks in the wind tunnel more than Merc (7 weeks) and RBR(7.5 weeks). In Haas's case, they have employees, that worked for Ferrari last year, working in a Haas section in Maranello. They use the Ferrari wind tunnel. Now Haas suffer from obvious buget constraints but not knowledge.
I'm not gonna sit here and tell you that Alpine is gonna win the constructors this year. I have no clue. I will tell you the odds of them finishing less that the 400 points they finished behind the 2nd place team is very high. Hey they may finish 100 points behind the 2nd place team but only 6th place.
Essentially I agree with this. It's part of why I didn't expect Alpine to catch right up to the leaders. Otmar suggest the team is not as efficient as it could be. The lack of upgrades between the test and now they will only have an aero upgrade after the 5th race according to autosport. That's a long time for a car which so badly needs changes imo.JPower wrote: ↑13 Mar 2022, 15:49Again, you don't catch up to teams that have spent $300+ million per year for a decade straight in one year of a budget cap. Renault was not spending on that level.
So no, I don't believe their facilities and institutional knowledge are on par with Mercedes/Ferrari/Red Bull until proven otherwise. If you do have proof they are, then Renault is the most underachieving team in the history of the sport.