I believe the now famous 2005 "Ferrari veto" was nothing more than the prolongation of their veto right under the Concord. The FIA wanted to go to majority voting and needed a spear head against the GPMA. So they simply promised Ferrari they would keep status quo while all other teams would fall back to majority voting. Bloody cheaky but simple in terms of thinking by Ferrari.They still have the ultimate sanction at their disposal, which is to leave F1. I still think this would hurt F1 more than it would hurt Ferrari, but perhaps only in the short to medium term.
And for a guide to the importance of Ferrari to Ecclestone and the FIA, you need only consider the implications of this veto, over which the court case was fought. The team was so important to Mosley and Ecclestone in 2005 that they were prepared to give one team special powers and rights, which were denied to others. How much has the business case changed, on which that decision was based? And how far has the attitude behind it changed?
u401768 wrote:with the situation going out of control - what happens if none of the FOTA teams enter? And is this a posability?
Alonso is worried!!:- http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/75445
With the changes you are proposing, it would barely make a difference to the average viewer. I bet if you asked most casual F1 fans they wouldn't be able to tell the difference. They still go fast (and you cannot with the naked eye see the 2009 cars slower than 2004) and make a lot of noise.ernos5 wrote:I really hope now, being a Ferrari supporter that those teams who wanted to pull out do so, leaving all those new teams to play around with each other next year.
The teams that pull out make their own championship with V10's!!! [-o< and faster than 2004. Then everybody would watch that, and Ecclestone will be sacked as he won't have no viewers, Mosley will be sacked for f#$king up the pinnacle of auto racing.
"The only thing I can say on this, How many times do we see a sea of red amongst the supporters.......... What if that sea of red was not there.." Saunder
Speed beyond what we've seen before would definitely make F1 more interesting. That's what we need, faster cars. After all you can't call this the pinnacle of motor sport then. Yes the V8's are pretty loud, but on TV they put the volume of the cars right down so you can't hear the cars, just the commentators blabbing on about the obvious aspects of the race.Scotracer wrote:With the changes you are proposing, it would barely make a difference to the average viewer. I bet if you asked most casual F1 fans they wouldn't be able to tell the difference. They still go fast (and you cannot with the naked eye see the 2009 cars slower than 2004) and make a lot of noise.ernos5 wrote:I really hope now, being a Ferrari supporter that those teams who wanted to pull out do so, leaving all those new teams to play around with each other next year.
The teams that pull out make their own championship with V10's!!! [-o< and faster than 2004. Then everybody would watch that, and Ecclestone will be sacked as he won't have no viewers, Mosley will be sacked for f#$king up the pinnacle of auto racing.
"The only thing I can say on this, How many times do we see a sea of red amongst the supporters.......... What if that sea of red was not there.." Saunder
I'm just worried about a break-away series ala Indycar/Champcar which destroyed the sport. Yes Champcar was good for some years but it really did die on its feet. Also I hope they aren't irresponsible enough to have super-relaxed regulations which then encourages speeds beyond anything we've seen before (albeit that's what the 2010 regs for F1 are suggesting).