That should always be the main priority IMO.
There is a new movement "Ban all short radius chicanes" as they are an afront to logic and stop the world from progressing
"New" Silverstone came about because of the bikes and Bernie being a twat to the BRDC over hosting rights. I think the new layout is ok as it gives us back a fast corner at Abbey after years of the chicane.
Yep. I remember watching Villeneuve trying to take Eau Rouge flat back in the day when it really wasn't possible (or just barely); a brave driver indeed. Great stuff and sorely missed with today's flat everywhere corners. Best F1 circuit never raced, IMHO, is Road America.AR3-GP wrote: ↑16 Nov 2022, 18:06Only because the cars are so easy to drive now. Everything is just a no lift "kink" now.Big Tea wrote: ↑16 Nov 2022, 17:38Spa is a shadow of its former self now.harty71 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2022, 17:19For me it has to be Silverstone, it's not only an epic track to drive, it also offers some of the best racing you can find.
Many say Spa but it just doesn't have the great races like Silverstone does, I mean what circuit offers overtaking opportunities in just about every corner, number one by a mile in my opinion.
I knew that someone would come back with that one…MadMax wrote: ↑17 Nov 2022, 00:18"New" Silverstone came about because of the bikes and Bernie being a twat to the BRDC over hosting rights. I think the new layout is ok as it gives us back a fast corner at Abbey after years of the chicane.
I'm surprised you like the original layout, however...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... ne1948.png
I remember going to Silverstone in 1996 and one could still see the original Becketts inside kerb behind the seating at the then new Becketts layout. I'd guess it's long gone by now, however.[quote/]
I think much of the reason for adding slower sections was also because on the older very fast layout, overtaking was al but impossible - the corners were all very fast and there was nowhere that allowed a driver to use out-braking to get a chance. The Woodcote chicane in the late 70s- early 80s was the only part of the track that wasn't 100mph-plus. Before that chicane, all of the corners were long and fast - imagine a modern car around this layout, the drivers would be knackered in 20 laps as it would be brutally fast:Stu wrote: ↑17 Nov 2022, 09:27Then it had what everyone thought was a big update, with several ‘complexes’ being added to slow the track and give more car visibility to people in the grandstands (and more grandstands, to boot! £££ for the BRDC); the ‘old’ layout was retained for a while to suit classics & vintage racing (this gave us the Bridge into Luffield into Woodcote complex & the Vale complex as well as Maggots (RIP Abbey…).
The new layout, imo, is a step too far from the classic layout, which was at least geographically identifiable before.
As someone who started watching in the 00's it's genuinely mind boggling to think that the 1990 layout was basically 1 chicane away from what they used in 1950. When I think of someone like Senna winning at Silverstone I imagine it's something much closer to the 00's layout.Stu wrote: ↑17 Nov 2022, 09:27The turbo cars of the eighties were awesome around that layout (into the nineties the track had the fastest average qualifying speed record- quicker than Monza!). Then it had what everyone thought was a big update, with several ‘complexes’ being added to slow the track and give more car visibility to people in the grandstands (and more grandstands, to boot! £££ for the BRDC); the ‘old’ layout was retained for a while to suit classics & vintage racing (this gave us the Bridge into Luffield into Woodcote complex & the Vale complex as well as Maggots (RIP Abbey…).
It was a track for the truly brave! Qualifying was something to beholdGooch wrote: ↑18 Nov 2022, 17:01As someone who started watching in the 00's it's genuinely mind boggling to think that the 1990 layout was basically 1 chicane away from what they used in 1950. When I think of someone like Senna winning at Silverstone I imagine it's something much closer to the 00's layout.Stu wrote: ↑17 Nov 2022, 09:27The turbo cars of the eighties were awesome around that layout (into the nineties the track had the fastest average qualifying speed record- quicker than Monza!). Then it had what everyone thought was a big update, with several ‘complexes’ being added to slow the track and give more car visibility to people in the grandstands (and more grandstands, to boot! £££ for the BRDC); the ‘old’ layout was retained for a while to suit classics & vintage racing (this gave us the Bridge into Luffield into Woodcote complex & the Vale complex as well as Maggots (RIP Abbey…).
https://www.racingcircuits.info/assets/ ... e87-90.png
It would be much too easy for modern cars though surely?Stu wrote: ↑18 Nov 2022, 19:44It was a track for the truly brave! Qualifying was something to beholdGooch wrote: ↑18 Nov 2022, 17:01As someone who started watching in the 00's it's genuinely mind boggling to think that the 1990 layout was basically 1 chicane away from what they used in 1950. When I think of someone like Senna winning at Silverstone I imagine it's something much closer to the 00's layout.Stu wrote: ↑17 Nov 2022, 09:27The turbo cars of the eighties were awesome around that layout (into the nineties the track had the fastest average qualifying speed record- quicker than Monza!). Then it had what everyone thought was a big update, with several ‘complexes’ being added to slow the track and give more car visibility to people in the grandstands (and more grandstands, to boot! £££ for the BRDC); the ‘old’ layout was retained for a while to suit classics & vintage racing (this gave us the Bridge into Luffield into Woodcote complex & the Vale complex as well as Maggots (RIP Abbey…).
https://www.racingcircuits.info/assets/ ... e87-90.png