Lewis obviously had his usual "bozo moment once in year" (i.e. vs Albon 2020/2019, vs Verstappen at Silverstone, vs Alonso last year)ringo wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 16:58I posted the video. Piastri had enough room to do exactly what Lewis did. And he was not fully alongside as Hamilton.dialtone wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 16:51People keep saying this but it's not true at all... It's a completely different setting and Piastri had half a car next to Hamilton rather than barely a front wing.Puffpirat wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 16:47Charles did the same to Lewis 2019 but Lewis went in the gras, avoiding it, no penalty. Sainz did the same two times this race, no penalty because the Red Bulls avoided. Piastri didn’t yield, penalty. Make of that what you will. Position was gone, yielding would’ve been the sensible choice. Guess he was still pissed McLaren undercut him with Lando. Not to mention he ran of Lewis one lap earlier…
2019 Hamilton vs Leclerc is more similar to Leclerc vs Perez this race, Piastri had nowhere to go here. I like Ham but this was unnecessary, he was passing on the inside and Piastri already gave up, why should he expect to be closed out?
If piastri had dodged, the same result as charles and lewis maybe. But there was a collision so of course 5 seconds. Thats the rules and fair. Piastri is responsible for his own risk management.
You cannot ask for a harsher penalty for hamilton just because of how piastri managed his risk.
Its 5 seconds for causing a collision and thats the rule.
But I think Piastri should've backed off really, not need to defend that much.
Lewis maneuver against Norris and Albon was much riskier but went well cause the opponent managed their risks more.