No one would remember Wolff, If it weren't for his cringe radio messages to George.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 09:41And like Toto said - come Sunday no one will remember the drain cover.
Track looks to be decent for racing. Good news if we are about to get it for next 10 years.
I am glad I was not wrong. The circuit delivered great racing and having these colder temperatures actually worked for a lot of teams that aren't great in ambient and higher than ambient temperatures.mendis wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 08:13Why is it that every new circuit is criticised to death, only to see it as an entertaining thing that we want more of it. Singapore, Baku, Saudi, Abu Dhabi, Miami etc., Even Vietnam, which didn't happen in the end. Saudi was dubbed as a death trap because of enclosure and high speed. It turned out to be a fascinating circuit offering great racing. Give it a break and give it a chance. Vegas is a new adventure for modern cars and drivers to adapt to new demands. Let's see how this turns out before criticizing it.
Get rid of that lousy Monaco.
Sainz will rememberFittingMechanics wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 09:41And like Toto said - come Sunday no one will remember the drain cover.
Track looks to be decent for racing. Good news if we are about to get it for next 10 years.
This track is very short and the deg on Verstappen's hard tire was not big. I think he would have caught and passed Leclerc. The gap was only around 2-3 seconds before the final SC.search wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 10:07it was still not a bad race, I'd think.
Did Verstappen win because of the collision with Russell in the end, though, or do you think he would have taken it without the safety car as well? It didn't gain him any positions, of course, but before, his tires were 5 laps older than Leclerc's, afterwards 5 laps fresher. So it could have made the difference.
Low downforce setups, maybe?GrizzleBoy wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 09:19I'm surprised myself to be honest.organic wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 09:16I rescind my vegas slanderGrizzleBoy wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 09:15
Nah this place socks.
It's all about the show, nothing to do with racing.
Should cancel for next year.
Etc.
This is the first time I can remember in a while that cars can follow nose to tail for almost the whole race.
He just went from 6 laps older tires to 5 fresher, no difference at all...AR3-GP wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 10:09This track is very short and the deg on Verstappen's hard tire was not big. I think he would have caught and passed Leclerc. The gap was only around 2-3 seconds before the final SC.search wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 10:07it was still not a bad race, I'd think.
Did Verstappen win because of the collision with Russell in the end, though, or do you think he would have taken it without the safety car as well? It didn't gain him any positions, of course, but before, his tires were 5 laps older than Leclerc's, afterwards 5 laps fresher. So it could have made the difference.
My comment was with regards to Verstappen being on 5 lap older tires and the RB have very good tire wear. I don't know what you are asking.nico5 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 10:15He just went from 6 laps older tires to 5 fresher, no difference at all...AR3-GP wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 10:09This track is very short and the deg on Verstappen's hard tire was not big. I think he would have caught and passed Leclerc. The gap was only around 2-3 seconds before the final SC.search wrote: ↑19 Nov 2023, 10:07it was still not a bad race, I'd think.
Did Verstappen win because of the collision with Russell in the end, though, or do you think he would have taken it without the safety car as well? It didn't gain him any positions, of course, but before, his tires were 5 laps older than Leclerc's, afterwards 5 laps fresher. So it could have made the difference.