Are you saying that the battery is used in the same way during overtaking/defending and the regular laps?mwillems wrote: ↑23 Sep 2024, 22:40Was Lando not using his battery??DoctorRadio wrote: ↑23 Sep 2024, 22:04It’s you who see what you want to see; you take the laps in free air as an absolute point of reference for pace on Hards, when in some of those laps the car that has executed the overtake recharges the battery and the tyres have overheated because of the overtake and need to cool down.mwillems wrote: ↑23 Sep 2024, 21:52No one said it was a private club or that you can't post, no one is being rude to you.
Leclerc was indeed just .2 faster on newer tyres when in clean air.
Leclerc did not have the delta on mediums to make real headway against cars that on hards were much slower and that he would have turned over quite quickly.
The hard stint in particular is painfully obvious, but it seems to be more a case that you don't want to see it.
Really, I will say that Mclaren was untouchable even by Leclerc in an hypothetical head to head, if that’s what pleases you.
As I've now stated a multitude of times. That .2s was when neither driver was overtaking or in traffic. It is a real and representative example of the pace of the two cars on the same compound. Leclerc was nowhere near his rivals for the bulk of the Hard stint. He was racing for many laps in the same conditions as Lando. He was .2s faster on average, a number that is less than the 6 lap delta and on tyres needing to do 6 laps less and so can be pushed more.
The Ferrari was not on Mclarens pace yesterday.
That’s news to me.
My last post here, I’ll go down to your logic and compare lap 43-48, both in free air, 0,5s/lap advantage Leclerc (62.5s gap on lap 43, 60s on lap 48).
Lap 51-56, after Leclerc had to overtake Hamilton (overheated tyres in dirty air, depleted battery for 1-2 subsequent laps), gap went down 0.4s/lap.
Accounting for the race time he lost with Alonso and the 2 Mercedes I have 0,6s, so it’s more or less that.
And you have 0.2s, so I give up.
I reiterate I have never said Leclerc was fastest, but he would have pressured Norris, I’ve no doubt on that.