I love the way you keep proving my points Chris.
Rage?
Not with that picture shirley.
autogyro wrote:I have no interest in whether you or anyone else believes me.allstaruk08 wrote:autogyro sounds like one of them inventors that go on dragon den saying how amazingly awesome they design is, how its better than everything else out there just for the dragons to tell them its crap but he doesnt believe what they are saying. Dont waste your life with this, sounds like you arn't mega rich from it if your ideas really were amazing you wouldn't be on here trying to convince us how good it is.
I have no intention of convincing any of you of anything thanks.
That is a concept of complete irrelevance.
If you do not like it, then why act like a know it all nobody and bother to post.
Like I said before, I have dealt with people much more important in the scheme of things than you, that is obvious from your puerile contributions.
Indeed they are, I have made the decision that autogyro's posts aren't of sufficient quality or humourous enough to dignify them with a real response.MinacciolMotors wrote:Chris. Your pictures are heinous and uncalled for. Wtf were you thinking?!?! Also, please post more. They are humorous.
Don't rise to the bait bud.allstaruk08 wrote: you clearly do care or you wouldn't keep posting trying to prove your gearbox would work (if it did work im sure it would be in use now). How am i acting like the know it all nobody your the person with the super amazing gearbox and all those stolen ideas and still posting on here telling people about it, sounds to me like your the know it all nobody.
So what?allstaruk08 wrote:autogyro wrote:I have no interest in whether you or anyone else believes me.allstaruk08 wrote:autogyro sounds like one of them inventors that go on dragon den saying how amazingly awesome they design is, how its better than everything else out there just for the dragons to tell them its crap but he doesnt believe what they are saying. Dont waste your life with this, sounds like you arn't mega rich from it if your ideas really were amazing you wouldn't be on here trying to convince us how good it is.
I have no intention of convincing any of you of anything thanks.
That is a concept of complete irrelevance.
If you do not like it, then why act like a know it all nobody and bother to post.
Like I said before, I have dealt with people much more important in the scheme of things than you, that is obvious from your puerile contributions.
you clearly do care or you wouldn't keep posting trying to prove your gearbox would work (if it did work im sure it would be in use now). How am i acting like the know it all nobody your the person with the super amazing gearbox and all those stolen ideas and still posting on here telling people about it, sounds to me like your the know it all nobody.
autogyro wrote:So many posts with so much sensible content. Hahaha
Another poor image peeerlease.
When the brain goes blank the engineer turns to semantics every time.
I know one engineer who believes engineering must also encourage art.
He is right but few have the capability or the wider education required.
Keep trying Chris.
I thought you were 'trying' to redirect the thread into an art appreciation debate.xxChrisxx wrote:autogyro wrote:So many posts with so much sensible content. Hahaha
Another poor image peeerlease.
When the brain goes blank the engineer turns to semantics every time.
I know one engineer who believes engineering must also encourage art.
He is right but few have the capability or the wider education required.
Keep trying Chris.
Trying what?
No art here.autogyro wrote:I thought you were 'trying' to redirect the thread into an art appreciation debate.
Like I said. Keep trying.
Oh no, not an 'art/fact' debate. I find most engineers far to narrow minded for such deep thought, especially the religious aspects.xxChrisxx wrote:No art here.autogyro wrote:I thought you were 'trying' to redirect the thread into an art appreciation debate.
Like I said. Keep trying.
Only fact.
Very true but no strait lines! Fact.xxChrisxx wrote:Yes... yes I do.
and I don't read Dawkins. Dr Seuss is more to my liking. Many truths to be had from the Cat in the Hat.
You are completely missing the point.allstaruk08 wrote:No post away! im not worried about anything but anyone can say they made something and then not back it up. Infact last week i made a 2.4 V8 its kicking out about 900BHP and it uses about the same amount of fuel as the current F1 engines. See how easy it is to talk --- on here lol if your going big something up the you gotta back up what your saying.