Lotus T127 Cosworth

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

Nah Mod, you're just saying that because you're a jilted ex-FOTA lover.



:lol:
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

User avatar
Pandamasque
17
Joined: 09 Nov 2009, 17:28
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

It may have just sounded that way :wink:

On a side note, This new fashion of opening threads for 2010 cars before the end of the 2009 season is plain wrong. Most of the posts have nothing to do with the actual topic title. Just like the cars on the pictures have very little to do with the ones to (hopefully) run in 2010.

This silly season is somehow sillier than last year and the one before.

scarbs
scarbs
393
Joined: 08 Oct 2003, 09:47
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

pipex wrote:Hi scarbs, i don't know if the name i used for the part is right but i saw it at 00:30 and 01:04. Maybe it was a mistake from me. :oops:
Ah I see... That part isn't the snowplough, its the splitter. Often known as the 'Tea tray'. This part has to exist to meet the flat bottom rules. Although its also part of the aero to seperate the airflows aroudn and under the car, the little fences running along its edge are common, only williams run without them.

A 'snowplough' is a term I've used to apply to Williams or Brawns devices under the nose, Brawn have a curved vane accross the splitter, while Williams have theirs under the nose cone. The create a vortex to affect the airflow and hence pressure distribution under the floor (to the diffuser).

RH1300S
RH1300S
1
Joined: 06 Jun 2005, 15:29

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

n smikle wrote:Question; Why do the Brits despise this new Lotus team? I have read numerous times where Bits pass the team off as some hopeless imitator or as an unrelated spin off with just a licensed name. They look like the real deal to me. They have the name, the cars the technology, they own the company it self. What more do they have to do before they are accepted?
I wouldn't say 'despise' - perhaps suspicious of/uncertain/doubtful.

Lotus is a team dear to many people's hearts and it means a lot for it not to become just another debacle (think about the last days of Lotus or Brabham - very sad).

If it was called Team Malayasia or something - I'm sure everyone would be very impressed.

scarbs
scarbs
393
Joined: 08 Oct 2003, 09:47
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

Its about that very English trait, heritage….

I think Lotus, like Tyrrell is one of the teams that are close to the British fans hearts, as each team had so much character and success (at their peak). Equally both teams were headed by charismatic men who built up the team from their small garages and beat the grandee’s.

Now taking the teams name with a start up, almost faceless team, kind of belittles the character of the old team.

That said, I think Mike Gascoyne is a good man to head the team, he’s an extrovert and an innovator. Not quite to the same level as, but not that dissimilar to Colin Chapman.

Also one exception to the re-using an old teams name would have been Honda renaming back to Tyrrell under Ross Brawn, rather than the eponymous Brawn title. I think that would have been received well, as the team would have honoured and respected the names heritage.

Scarbs

RH1300S
RH1300S
1
Joined: 06 Jun 2005, 15:29

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

You know - I think part of the 'problem' is Mike Gascoyne - bear with me on this.....

If Ross Brawn had started a team with the Lotus name, there would be a lot more confidence.

I think the trouble with Mike is you never really know what will happen. Ross is a great manager and thoroughly understands engineering and also what it takes to ge the WHOLE job done.

I'm not so sure Mike is the man for that.

He might produce a brilliant car, it is also just as likely that the toys will start flying around.

meves
meves
1
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 12:01

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

Its about that very English trait, heritage…
I think we all have a passion for certain marques that have heritage or history not just the english. What would people be saying if the ferrari name purchased and a company in Vietnam (vietnam was a random country I chose)started making Ferrari F1 cars? I'd love to see the boards then.

The thing with Lotus was it had a very specific heritage with one of the great car designers who began and ran the marque. Lotus have a heritage of making very innovative and lightweight but efficient cars. We don't really want to see them come back as an also ran.... but we'd love to see them back to their glory days.
Last edited by meves on 08 Dec 2009, 14:03, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
raceman
0
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 08:57
Location: Pune, India

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

RH1300S wrote:You know - I think part of the 'problem' is Mike Gascoyne - bear with me on this.....

If Ross Brawn had started a team with the Lotus name, there would be a lot more confidence.

I think the trouble with Mike is you never really know what will happen. Ross is a great manager and thoroughly understands engineering and also what it takes to ge the WHOLE job done.

I'm not so sure Mike is the man for that.

He might produce a brilliant car, it is also just as likely that the toys will start flying around.
+1

I agree.

bill shoe
bill shoe
151
Joined: 19 Nov 2008, 08:18
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

Lotus has decided that Alex Yoong will be a scout to search for and develop talented young drivers.

http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=47519

I always dislike the ride-buying culture that exists in the bottom ~50% of F1 seats, but even by this standard Alex Yoong was the most blatantly unqualified ride-buyer of the modern F1 era. Now, Lotus is talking up its Malaysian connections and recruiting the assistance of people like Alex Yoong. This is not much info in the big picture, but it's significant information about the nature of the team and how it operates. I predict Lotus to be the worst of the new teams.

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

n smikle wrote:Question; Why do the Brits despise this new Lotus team?
I haven't noticed that, all the new teams are treated in the same way. I suggest it is a culture thing, lost in translation. What I see is a very healthy disregard for people who come along with showmanship and have yet to show their substance.

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

Lotus news on BBC wrote:Fernandes went on to state that his target for next season was to beat fellow F1 newcomer Virgin Racing, which is backed by British aviation tycoon Richard Branson.

"I said that number one we have to be ahead of Branson, otherwise I will retire and kill myself," he added.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsp ... 404964.stm
OK, so is that fact or opinion??? #-o
Last edited by Richard on 10 Dec 2009, 10:28, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Fil
0
Joined: 15 Jan 2007, 14:54
Location: Melbourne, Aus.

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

A modern day rivalry already, that's great to hear!

And if Lotus get their man Trulli, its the battle of the old teammates too, adding to the spice!
Any post(s) made by this user are (semi-)educated opinion(s), based on random fact(s) blurred by the smudges of time.
Any fact(s) claimed by this user will be supplemented by a link to the original source of said fact(s).

User avatar
Fil
0
Joined: 15 Jan 2007, 14:54
Location: Melbourne, Aus.

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

Trulli & Kovalainen have been confirmed as the drivers for Lotus in 2010.

Trulli with plenty of experience & Kovalainen now at his 3rd team in 4yrs. They both know how championship teams operate; great knowledge to learn from the pair for a new team.
Any post(s) made by this user are (semi-)educated opinion(s), based on random fact(s) blurred by the smudges of time.
Any fact(s) claimed by this user will be supplemented by a link to the original source of said fact(s).

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

on f1total.com some pics of the molds and buck of the monocoque are shown ....so they difinitively have not opted for a low and wide fueltank ,more so for the widest portion quite high ..lets see how the others compare...also square crossection at the nose nothing like redbull thinking there.So to me this looks like a very conservative approach.

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Lotus 2010 Car

Post

link to pics please