McLaren have chosen some interesting design routes on their new competitor. In addition to our own technical analysis, McLaren's Tim Goss and Paddy Lowe explain why some decisions have been made in light of the regulation changes.
+2 but we should call it "Fight Club" and the moderation has to be very minimalrichard_leeds wrote:+1 aka fanboy forumISLAMATRON wrote: As a side suggestion, maybe we should have a separate section for drivers like we do for the cars.
This topic was discussed ad infinitum already. Fact is with supposedly little aero difference between '09 and '10 there can be advantages/disadvantages with both approaches. We'd now for sure when cars hit the track, let's be patient.mstar wrote:can someone explain if we have limited wind tunnel time last season most teams (brawn, ferrari, a bit of redbull etc) devoted a lot of time end of the season to 2010, Mclaren seem to be churning out parts all the time and i am sure they must of invested a lot of time on 2009 in the wind tunnel which may hurt 2010 car design and wind tunnel time????
Well his input is clearly useful but it was mainly the engineers at the MTC who were misled by the calculations of their simulation tools what led to an incompetitive 24. Hopefully the 25 will set the record straight.n smikle wrote:Good clip, I see...That is why the 09 car sucked at the beginning. Hamilton had little input during 2008!! ...hmmm.. but since he is doing more input now, the MP4-25 is supposed to be unstoppable!!
...
Oh yeah!n smikle wrote:but since he is doing more input now, the MP4-25 is supposed to be unstoppable!!
Which one? Hamilton or the throttle pedal?ISLAMATRON wrote:Souns like great input to me.
