viewtopic.php?f=6&t=6649
Have a little read through that, we all see them but not all of us know what their for, would you rather hear bullshit (made up because we dont know) or some knowledgeable truth?
Me tooGiblet wrote:Williams more than anyone deserve some results. Frank just want to race, and he's strtig to realize that the money needs to come from other sources. WHP, and Williams Golf clubs, and whatever legit business they can get into will only help them keep improving.
They had bad luck in the 90's financially. They tried to align themselved with a good engine manufacturer like Mclaren did, but the story ends there. Mclaren got some rich Saudis, some rich Mercedes money, and were able to build into the monolith they are now.
Year on year I want to cheer them on, but it gets harder and harder as they just don't have the resources to develop like Macca.
One of the few garage teams left, I want them to succeed more than anyone, and I'm not a fanboy for any one team (pointless with all the inbreeding in F1), so that says a lot.
Yes this is correct. That surface looks like a not very nicely finished carbon panel. I'm guessing the materials used here would use some crazy high temp resins and these can be hard to process at times. But its definately not a delibrate surface texture.SoftBatch wrote:The dimples reduce pressure drag on the golf ball by tripping the boundary layer from laminar to turbulent flow thereby increasing the distance around the sphere at which the flow separates from the rear of the ball.
The dimpled effect of the carbon fiber weave is usually a result of that side of the panel not being the contact side for the mold used during the curing process.
Tim.Wright wrote:Yes this is correct. That surface looks like a not very nicely finished carbon panel. I'm guessing the materials used here would use some crazy high temp resins and these can be hard to process at times. But its definately not a delibrate surface texture.SoftBatch wrote:The dimples reduce pressure drag on the golf ball by tripping the boundary layer from laminar to turbulent flow thereby increasing the distance around the sphere at which the flow separates from the rear of the ball.
The dimpled effect of the carbon fiber weave is usually a result of that side of the panel not being the contact side for the mold used during the curing process.
Tim
I think it's Williams using the thinest coat of paint needed to give it some colour, and with no primer, the waeve shows throughSpencifer_Murphy wrote:Tim.Wright wrote:Yes this is correct. That surface looks like a not very nicely finished carbon panel. I'm guessing the materials used here would use some crazy high temp resins and these can be hard to process at times. But its definately not a delibrate surface texture.SoftBatch wrote:The dimples reduce pressure drag on the golf ball by tripping the boundary layer from laminar to turbulent flow thereby increasing the distance around the sphere at which the flow separates from the rear of the ball.
The dimpled effect of the carbon fiber weave is usually a result of that side of the panel not being the contact side for the mold used during the curing process.
Tim
Yeah, that's what I was getting with at my post. Not sure if I was clear about that after a long bit about golf balls lol. I didn't think the golf ball effect would be beneficial on an F1 car. That coupled with the fact I've seen examples of carbon fibre weave showing through paint makes me think it's as simple as that. Just the weave showing through the layers.
They're not supposed to be but Mclaren and BMW (last year) found a way around those rules, so I'm guessing this is a simelar thing.tomazy wrote:I found one particulary interesting picture from Jerez testing. The rear wing on this picture has a white stip acros, and what looks like a gap in the middle of that strip? This is strange, becouse 3 part rear wings aren't legal?
What do you guys think?
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/5568/djm1020fe82.jpg
Do you have a picture of the front of the wing from the same test? The answer to your question might be there. - Check out the McLaren discussion from page 60 to 90 for further explanation.tomazy wrote:I found one particulary interesting picture from Jerez testing. The rear wing on this picture has a white stip acros, and what looks like a gap in the middle of that strip? This is strange, becouse 3 part rear wings aren't legal?
What do you guys think?
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/5568/djm1020fe82.jpg
Regarding the big picture, it looks more like a long main element with a white strip, followed by a short second element. My feeling is, that if you could see daylight through it then it couldn't be a blown flap. I think you can definitely see daylight through the small, high, slit. Also, note that you can see the normal williams 'slot' in the flap element above the jack man's head. So I'd be surprised if this was a blowing slot in addition to the normal slot.tomazy wrote:I found one particulary interesting picture from Jerez testing. The rear wing on this picture has a white stip acros, and what looks like a gap in the middle of that strip? This is strange, becouse 3 part rear wings aren't legal?
What do you guys think?
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/5568/djm1020fe82.jpg