Jersey Tom wrote:ARB's do exactly what the name would imply. It helps reduce body roll by stiffening the suspension.
Sorry but not quite, ARB's connect the front wheels or the rears, and work by the loaded wheel going into compression and "attempting to pull" the unladen wheel into compression as well. This causes the ARB to twist. The amount of twist, is the allowable amount of roll. It does not "stiffen" the suspension per say. Only stiffens the roll resistance and the act of rolling and acts on the weight transfer not only on the front wheels but also the diagonal weight transfer
JT, ARB's do not increase spring rate but they do allow a lesser spring rate to be run with stiffer ARB's.
Springs can do the same, but one advantage of the ARB is that it does not engage in axle (two wheel) heave, or in chassis pitch.
Sorry, not quite right again. Springs can control the rate of roll, but do not have a finite roll resistance as the ARB does. And they only have a weight transfer effect on one corner of the car. A front ARB can effect three corners of the car at one time, with a minor effect on the fourth... Springs and ARB's are not the same thing nor share the same effects.....
For the OP,...
As far as F1 goes, the jury is out as to whether they run arb's (it is said they don't) however they are running torsion bars as springs, the question become whether they are connected across the front or the rear. An ARB, is a "form" of a torsion bar, but a torsion bar used for springs isn't an ARB, IF the center of the torsion bar isn't connected between the front wheels or rear wheels , it's just a different form of springing. Connecting it would have a non-independent effect and it would "act" like a sway bar, and not like independent springs....
"Driving a car as fast as possible (in a race) is all about maintaining the highest possible acceleration level in the appropriate direction." Peter Wright,Techical Director, Team Lotus