I guess the upper one is just not fully assembled=)McMrocks wrote:agree. Due to Fia tests?Dragonfly wrote:The lower ends of the pylons (attachment points?) look different between the two noses.
I guess the upper one is just not fully assembled=)McMrocks wrote:agree. Due to Fia tests?Dragonfly wrote:The lower ends of the pylons (attachment points?) look different between the two noses.
Well it can't be upright / wishbone / pushrod / spring / trackrod / rocker because a failure of any of these would most likely cause a DNF.kalinka wrote:According to an Autosport interview about Hamilton's bad setup in Japan : When quizzed on the exact nature of the problem, Hamilton added: "It's not a suspension failure, because I could still drive with it.
There was just a part that helps the balance and when you set it up it should react in one way but it didn't do that."
So what part could it be exactly, that helps the balance, and it's not a suspension failure?
WhiteBlue wrote:The McLaren had a new engine sound in FP1 at half throttle. It sounds awful. I wonder if that was legal.
seinfeld wrote:WhiteBlue wrote:The McLaren had a new engine sound in FP1 at half throttle. It sounds awful. I wonder if that was legal.
I totally agree, it was at the low end of the rev range. sounded like traction control
It was the first thing that popped into my head when i heard it. Obviously it´s illegal but still an interesting sound.seinfeld wrote:I totally agree, it was at the low end of the rev range. sounded like traction control
May be not using DRS?Javert wrote:23 4 Lewis Hamilton 14:34:19 308.4
24 3 Jenson Button 14:54:29 308.3
Both McLaren very bad on top speed
It's for the new engine map?
They have - in Japan, just as well as ROS, RAI and KOB.raymondu999 wrote:McLaren have fielded (to my reckoning) all 8 of their season engines. Perhaps they dialled the performance down to save engine life?