Be cool if you could put them next to the original?Leon wrote: *mercedes Photoshop*
Be cool if you could put them next to the original?Leon wrote: *mercedes Photoshop*
[/quote][/quote]gilgen wrote: Isn't it a shame, how Merc have tried to claim the term "Silver Arrows" as their own? The original term was more generic and applied equally to Auto Union.
VERY nice! The top one looks like Merc's Alubeam Silver, which I've been hoping they'd use for years now. Perhaps they finally are? We'll know in a few hours when photos start rolling in.
Yes, I was being ironic, but I still appreciate your post. I'd like to add to it though, since we're now being a little more serious. Even the story you posted is under dispute as are *all* Silver Arrow origin stories, because no one is entirely sure how the livery/nomenclature began. Auto Union fans tend to point to what you said, while Merc fans tend to point to either Neubauer's "explanation" or Von Brauchitsch's SSKL, which was supposedly the first to actually be referred to as a "Silberpfeil" by the radio announcers at the 1932 German Grand Prix at AVUS. Then you have the whole prewar/postwar angle to it. It ultimately doesn't matter though. Suffice it to say, I don't think there's a problem with any German marque painting their race cars silver.feynman wrote:Not sure if the winky smiley means you are being ironic ...
done bro check backajdavison2 wrote:Be cool if you could put them next to the original?Leon wrote: *mercedes Photoshop*
I agree. Plus chrome is not the same as silver.ajdavison2 wrote:Wicked! Love the chrome but I can't see them ever doing it because mclaren have kind of got dibs on that haha.
21.1 The provisions of the Code relating to national colours shall not apply to the Championship.turbof1 wrote:Isn't a consensus among the teams required to change the livery?
You're right, I was on an SLS forum recently and the owners who had paid for the Alubeam option said that photos don't always do it justice, but in person the paint looks permanently wet. "Painted with liquid metal", is what I kept reading.Pup wrote:The alubeam photos I've seen must not do it justice, because it just looks like dull silver to me.
A collective group of talented engineers is what Mercedes are aiming for. Lowe coming in toward the end of the year, and apparently James Allison waiting in the wings to be announced by Mercedes(although some say Ferrari)."If you look at what has worked in the past, even Benetton (in 1994-5), the glory days of Ferrari, the glory days of McLaren, you can see there was a group of people which could almost interact non-verbally with each other.They fitted them together, the engine was good, the driver was good, the chassis was solid.The management worked with each other, a good group of mechanics, a good group of engineers, good technical director, a creative mind in the design office and aero department and a good businessman and politician safeguarding all these guys from the nasty bits."
Thanks for trying to second guess me! No, I was not trying to get the Merc fans riled up. I was pointing out that a team were trying to hi-jack a well known term, and use it to describe themselves. I also pointed out that even McLaren tried the same thing. Refer to the FOS when Auto Unions and Mercs ran together.......the entire collection was properly described as "Silver Arrows". Traditionalists know the difference.Cocles wrote:
Gilgen though is just trying to get the Merc fan's riled up. What's he going to say next? "Isn't it a shame, how Ferrari have tried to claim the color "Rosso Corsa" as their own? The original term was more generic and applied equally to Alfa Romeo."
Traditionalists do indeed know the difference.It since has been established that von Brauchitsch in 1932 had raced a streamlined SSKL on the AVUS which was called Silver Arrow in live radio coverage.