I think it is because RB have a far better and finer control over the front floor pillar support.radosav wrote:Red Bull still has big amount of rake, how is it possible with new exhaust rules ?
Iirc their front wing vortices control allows them to seal the sides of the floor better than anyone else.autogyro wrote:I think it is because RB have a far better and finer control over the front floor pillar support.radosav wrote:Red Bull still has big amount of rake, how is it possible with new exhaust rules ?
I believe it is connected to the suspension and can be set to be closer to the ground than on other cars.
so if renault gets on top of their problems they could be real threat to competition this seasondjos wrote:Iirc their front wing vortices control allows them to seal the sides of the floor better than anyone else.autogyro wrote:I think it is because RB have a far better and finer control over the front floor pillar support.radosav wrote:Red Bull still has big amount of rake, how is it possible with new exhaust rules ?
I believe it is connected to the suspension and can be set to be closer to the ground than on other cars.
It's 4MJ per lap from the ERS to the mgu-k, rate limited at 120 kW. The mgu-h straight to the mgu-k is not limited by energy, and only limited by the 120 kW mgu-k, so it is possible for them to use more than 4MJ of electric energy per lap.atanatizante wrote:Last year car : 750+82HP for 6,67 sec./lap
This year car : 600+160HP for 33,33 sec./lap and almost 30% loss in downforce and 50kg heavier, though just in Qualy ... and also the tyres are harder now ...
So which car is faster? for both cases:
a) Qualy mode
b) Race mode
That's interesting because - whilst it's possible they were using different fuel loads - it gives us an idea that there might be 5 to 6 tenths between the softs and supersofts.diemaster wrote:1.34.813 Hamilton on softs
1:34.263 Hamilton on supersofts