What would be effect? It would make engine slightly shorter? If it's true than it seems that Merc made a lot of unorthodox moves to get the best packaging possible. It is surprising that they managed to extract so much performance out of an engine. I wonder if log exhast costs some hps -- so maybe their strength is in that they made compromises on the ICE side but made things easier for ERS systems?tok-tokkie wrote:That video is clearly not up to date and it is a different one to the earlier one we saw. Scarbs points out that the compressor has been moved on the Merc car. We also know that the Merc uses a 'log' exhaust header pipe.
But what I find interesting is it again shows the crankshaft with complex offset throws. When this was discussed earlier someone posted part of the regulations stating that the crankshaft can only have 3 throws. I really wonder what the story is behind this. Whoever did the CGI must have based it on something coming from within the organisation - surely? This is much clearer than the previous video. Press spacebar to stop the video.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7412/1326 ... 181d_o.jpg
I think they expand the airbox for the air filter.Blackout wrote:Made a (ugly) Paint drawing showing how the Merc layout is IMO
(Black: the intercooler is above the angine / Green: the intercooler is in the sidepod)
Edit: maybe the green one is closer to the real layout. The upper cooler might just be a water rad for the air-water intercooler
http://www.servimg.com/image_preview.ph ... u=14795526
Blackout wrote:Made a (ugly) Paint drawing showing how the Merc layout is IMO
(Black: the intercooler is above the angine / Green: the intercooler is in the sidepod)
Edit: maybe the green one is closer to the real layout. The upper cooler might just be a water rad for the air-water intercooler
http://www.servimg.com/image_preview.ph ... u=14795526
Vettel had a kers issue I believe!De Jokke wrote:Does any else think that Hamilton and vettel suffered the same kind of issue?
They both lost a cylinder and it happened on the formation lap. So I think the restart somehow messed up something in the engine data/electrical system.
If I am correct, Hamilton's problem already started before the race.. and Mercedes hoped that it would cure it self.De Jokke wrote:Does any else think that Hamilton and vettel suffered the same kind of issue?
They both lost a cylinder and it happened on the formation lap. So I think the restart somehow messed up something in the engine data/electrical system.
Wouldn't it be better if they pulled him before the race start and looked at his engine?Owen.C93 wrote:Actually they didn't tell him.
The "ram air" from the air box inlet, to me, would be more useful for cooling(specifically the intercooler) than for turbo inlet air, and then after it can be directed towards the "hot side" of the turbo, TERS-MGU, and gearbox rad all in line.Blackout wrote:Made a (ugly) Paint drawing showing how the Merc layout is IMO
(Black: the intercooler is above the angine / Green: the intercooler is in the sidepod)
Edit: maybe the green one is closer to the real layout. The upper cooler might just be a water rad for the air-water intercooler
http://www.servimg.com/image_preview.ph ... u=14795526
No, because it would never be fixed in time.Sevach wrote:Wouldn't it be better if they pulled him before the race start and looked at his engine?Owen.C93 wrote:Actually they didn't tell him.
Even if it meant dropping from pole to starting from the pitlane, seems like a wiser choice to me.
Anyways...