beelsebob wrote:Powershift wrote:l4mbch0ps wrote:Combination of factors of course, but the major points are likely:
- higher rear downforce
- superior heat management vis a vis brakes and wheels
- better understanding of the compound characteristics
- better traction management
- differences in the compound itself from last year
No way there is more rear downforce than last year, but the new compounds are probably helping a lot. I think they also moved a lot of weight forwards this year for a more forward weight distribution than last year. Plus the cars probably weigh less on the starting grid this year than last.
The car doesn't need to have more than last year, just proportionally more than last year relative to the other cars on the grid.
We are comparing the rear tire wear rates from last year to this year, so it has very little to do with
"proportionally more than last year relative to the other cars on the grid."
but since Bahrain was switched from day to night this year, and China is front limited, we only have AUS and MAL to go by. In Spain last year the Mercs destroyed their rear tires mercilessly, we will see how they cope this year, but I can easily surmise that they have less rear downforce(and overall downforce) than last year, and that would not be one of the reasons why they have better rear tire wear this year.
Winning is the most important. Everything is consequence of that. Being second is to be the first of the ones who lose.-Ayrton Senna