Yea Kimi is working the tires beautifully!henra wrote:Indeed. Kimi is still the master of tyre preservation. And F1 is again all about tyre saving. That is what holds Merc back. In raw pace they could easily fly away. But the tyres won't take it.SectorOne wrote:Close one!
By doing that, they would lose track position, forcing them to make an overtake, and probably use up any tyre advantage they had in doing so.SectorOne wrote:But we need to realize Mercedes can go longer on the compounds but Ferrari has used Vettel as a guinea pig twice now forcing Mercedes to shorten their stints to cover any possible undercut.
Instead of being alarmed by Vettel undercutting them, they should simply go about their stint, let Vettel take the lead, it will pay off later in the stints anyways.
Which Rosberg did twice, so it´s possible as proven.Moose wrote:By doing that, they would lose track position, forcing them to make an overtake, and probably use up any tyre advantage they had in doing so.SectorOne wrote:But we need to realize Mercedes can go longer on the compounds but Ferrari has used Vettel as a guinea pig twice now forcing Mercedes to shorten their stints to cover any possible undercut.
Instead of being alarmed by Vettel undercutting them, they should simply go about their stint, let Vettel take the lead, it will pay off later in the stints anyways.
At this circuit, sure. At China... probably not. In general, not worth increasing the risk of a collision, or a driver failing to pass.SectorOne wrote:Which Rosberg did twice, so it´s possible as proven.Moose wrote:By doing that, they would lose track position, forcing them to make an overtake, and probably use up any tyre advantage they had in doing so.SectorOne wrote:But we need to realize Mercedes can go longer on the compounds but Ferrari has used Vettel as a guinea pig twice now forcing Mercedes to shorten their stints to cover any possible undercut.
Instead of being alarmed by Vettel undercutting them, they should simply go about their stint, let Vettel take the lead, it will pay off later in the stints anyways.
Not 'possible'. Confirmed by Toto straight after the race on Sky.multisync wrote:Rosberg possible brake issue.
They are gonna have to, otherwise it´s gonna bite them eventually. Like it almost did today.Moose wrote:At this circuit, sure. At China... probably not. In general, not worth increasing the risk of a collision, or a driver failing to pass.
cool, don't have nor ever will have SkyJ0rd4n wrote:Not 'possible'. Confirmed by Toto straight after the race on Sky.multisync wrote:Rosberg possible brake issue.
Ferrari is playing that quite cleverly, especially with inverting the tyre sequence for Kimi.SectorOne wrote: But we need to realize Mercedes can go longer on the compounds but Ferrari has used Vettel as a guinea pig twice now forcing Mercedes to shorten their stints to cover any possible undercut.
Excellent would have meant a win..I'm laughing because he's seems so adamant that he could compete with Hamilton yet got outclassed and out driven again..and then let 2 nd place go. Even without the so called BBW fault he would have lost the place.Moose wrote:Yeh, Vettel made a mess of this race. Looked like a complete noob.
Rosberg though - not sure why you're laughing, he drove an excellent race!