Sniffit wrote:I would say that it is karma for trying to circumvent the engine penalty rules and introduce a bunch of engines even though it was nothing wrong with the previous one.
Sniffit wrote:I would say that it is karma for trying to circumvent the engine penalty rules and introduce a bunch of engines even though it was nothing wrong with the previous one.
Same gagging order but from their association happened after Bianchi's crash and similar after Alonso's crash, I don't recall anyone complaining. Drivers (journalists too) are political animals and know when to shut up themselves, where the wind is blowing and who they can attack. If they care so much about safety they should attack Ecclestone now and speak freely .Diesel wrote:Any thoughts on the gagging order about the Pirelli stuff? Apparently Vettel/Ferrari turned around and accepted blame because Ecclestone told them to stop complaining, and all drivers have been told to not voice their concerns.
3-6 seconds if you compare with record lap, but comparing this new PU with last V8 they´re only less than one second slower, and that was comparing with 2014 GP (1:23.7 vs 1:24.5) when PU was new. We´ll see today but they probably will beat last V8 laptime.ChrisF1 wrote:They're not doing similar laptimes, they're 3-6 seconds off.Andres125sx wrote:I don´t get that obsession to improve laptimes, really. That´s too easy, just a matter of rulesChrisF1 wrote:I dream that one day we'll see a Formula 1 car lap break Montoya's 1:19.525
4.5 seconds off that last year in Qualifying.
They´re doing similar laptimes using a lot less fuel, to me that´s impressive.
As for the obesession with improving laptimes, we don't want to see lap records as such, we want to see drivers pushing the car to the edge. A car capable of doing a 79 second lap will take more balls than an 84 second car after all.
yea for sure they turned downGPR-A wrote:The other way to look at it would be, in the hands of Lewis, the old spec Merc PU could still have achieved pole, ahead of upgraded Ferrari PU. While Ferraris' and Nico's times improved from Q2 to Q3, Lewis stayed flat on the same. Either he didn't felt the need to push any more or Merc turned down things on his PU due to the reliability worries borne out of Nico's PU situation.
Yep, 2/10 such a big margin. Lets turn everything down to earth, we're so safe.GPR-A wrote:The other way to look at it would be, in the hands of Lewis, the old spec Merc PU could still have achieved pole, ahead of upgraded Ferrari PU. While Ferraris' and Nico's times improved from Q2 to Q3, Lewis stayed flat on the same. Either he didn't felt the need to push any more or Merc turned down things on his PU due to the reliability worries borne out of Nico's PU situation.
You will get the answers in the rest of season.Juzh wrote:Yep, 2/10 such a big margin. Lets turn everything down to earth, we're so safe.GPR-A wrote:The other way to look at it would be, in the hands of Lewis, the old spec Merc PU could still have achieved pole, ahead of upgraded Ferrari PU. While Ferraris' and Nico's times improved from Q2 to Q3, Lewis stayed flat on the same. Either he didn't felt the need to push any more or Merc turned down things on his PU due to the reliability worries borne out of Nico's PU situation.