F1 "closed": for or against ?

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.

Formula 1 closed :

for
43
42%
against
54
53%
no idea
5
5%
 
Total votes: 102

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

I do not get it: if they are going to convert the halo into a canopy, what is the point of the halo in the first place? Surely they can design a canopy as structurally strong as the halo itself.
#AeroFrodo

DarkAlman
DarkAlman
7
Joined: 08 Dec 2015, 05:25

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

Why not just use the front half of a fighter canopy?

That would deflect incoming debris and add an additional roll hoop in front of the driver.
The driver would still get in and out of the car like they do today.

Image

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

DarkAlman wrote:Why not just use the front half of a fighter canopy?

That would deflect incoming debris and add an additional roll hoop in front of the driver.
The driver would still get in and out of the car like they do today.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... on_AUT.jpg
Yeah, with a small but very strong bar on top of it connecting to the roll hoop. That would still allow sufficient room to get out of the cockpit, yet provide protection against a loose tyre hitting the driver from above.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
proteus
22
Joined: 13 Feb 2015, 14:35

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

FW17 wrote:
proteus wrote:i am sorry, but if this becomes the reality i will simply stop watching. Im not against safety of the drivers, but im strongly against using the most hidius and strange solutions...

Why didn't you stop when these ugly cockpit sides came along?

http://b.f1-facts.com/ul/a/5074
I see nothing wrong with sides of the cockpits in 96.
If i would get the money to start my own F1 team, i would revive Arrows

Facts Only
Facts Only
188
Joined: 03 Jul 2014, 10:25

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

FW17 wrote:
proteus wrote:i am sorry, but if this becomes the reality i will simply stop watching. Im not against safety of the drivers, but im strongly against using the most hidius and strange solutions...

Why didn't you stop when these ugly cockpit sides came along?

http://b.f1-facts.com/ul/a/5074
Ridiculous internet rhetoric hadn't been invented in 1996.
"A pretentious quote taken out of context to make me look deep" - Some old racing driver

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

BanMeToo wrote:^ how would the driver get out ?
Through the side

User avatar
proteus
22
Joined: 13 Feb 2015, 14:35

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

No need for closed cockpits. Arrows was decade and a half before its time. All they need to do is give it a little bit more structural streinght.

Image
If i would get the money to start my own F1 team, i would revive Arrows

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

Why bother with a driver.
Put the operator on a computer consul in the pits make the cars all the same like the engine manufacturers want and you have achieved the goal.
F1 joins the PC weedy modern western culture.
Or even better and much cheaper just use TV special effects.

User avatar
proteus
22
Joined: 13 Feb 2015, 14:35

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

autogyro wrote:Why bother with a driver.
Put the operator on a computer consul in the pits make the cars all the same like the engine manufacturers want and you have achieved the goal.
F1 joins the PC weedy modern western culture.
Or even better and much cheaper just use TV special effects.
I agree.
If i would get the money to start my own F1 team, i would revive Arrows

User avatar
Rhodium
25
Joined: 28 Jan 2013, 20:52

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

agree too.

F1 is dangerous sport.
all drivers know that.

they have millions dollars for make this job because it is a dangerous job too !
it's a part of the risk of this job.

with this philosophy, karting must be forbiden, "barquetta" in LeMans: forbiden, moto GP with Canopy ?

i hate this idea.
F1 must be F1, they try to kill this sport with her ideas (this F... new V6 engine, canopy, design horrible, fuel/tires rules)
after that, they don't understand why F1 is in crisis... i'm not Enstein, but i have my idea of F1 problems...

yes i'm angry, and i hope not be alone !

krisfx
krisfx
14
Joined: 04 Jan 2012, 23:07

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

DarkAlman wrote:I'm for the "idea" of closed cockpits, but not a halfassed implementation like this.

A closed cockpit wouldn't have saved Jules.
A halo probably wouldn't have stopped the spring that hit Massa in the head.

If F1 wants to go in this direction then they should use an aircraft style canopy or better an angled windscreen that can deflect incoming debris (and be an aero part of the car) that doesn't stop the driver from getting out of the car after a crash.
I agree with your first bit, though Henry Surtees would have been saved by a closed cockpit (I know he wasn't in F1 at the time but this stuff filters down).

I do, however think all the concepts so far have been hideous.

Neno
Neno
-29
Joined: 31 May 2010, 01:41

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

Against.

User avatar
mclaren111
280
Joined: 06 Apr 2014, 10:49
Location: Shithole - South Africa

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

AGAINST :oops: :oops: #-o :oops: :oops:

User avatar
proteus
22
Joined: 13 Feb 2015, 14:35

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

I guess gokards will look something like this in the future:

Image
If i would get the money to start my own F1 team, i would revive Arrows

BanMeToo
BanMeToo
6
Joined: 27 Dec 2013, 16:26
Location: USA

Re: F1 "closed": for or against ?

Post

FW17 wrote:
BanMeToo wrote:^ how would the driver get out ?
Through the side
lol what? what side? F1 cars should be open on the side now? :roll: :roll:


I am strongly pro-halo and don't understand the anti-safety arguments whatsoever. Thankfully, in this case, F1 often ignores its fans.