and when Ferrari test news parts for fighting with Mercedes ?
it's a shame, this ugly thing is a shame...
- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
This is correct, both eyes do create composite picture, but I think F1 can do better than this....COME ON F1, this is the best you HAVE? Really?bonjon1979 wrote:I think it looks fine. There won't be any massive issues with 'blind spots' as its right in between the two eyes meaning that you 'see through it'. In actual fact the right eye and left eye create a composite that gives you the whole picture rather than there being any kind of X ray vision! It might be distracting at first but nowhere near as distracting as a tyre in the face at 180mph
That Spring wouldn't have got through. The car is going forwards at such a rate that as it dropped down from above it would pass through the line of the halo to intersect with the drivers head. You would have to be very, very unlucky for it to squeeze through that tight gap at precisely the right angle to hit. Everyone is looking for perfection and it's never going to be that. This will stop a hell of a lot coming through the cockpit, it'll stop cars that are lifted up by the nose from hitting the drivers head, for me it's the best possible compromise.Tim.Wright wrote:Keeping it semi open as they are leaves you with all the aerodynamic disadvantages of an open cockpit while simultaneously guaranteeing that small debris accidents such as what happened to Massa remain unprotected.
http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article ... 847811.jpg
Nothing in the world would've stopped bianchi from dying. It's not the blunt force impact, it's the deceleration. My mum has been in a coma for three weeks with the same diffuse axonal haemorrhage but in her accident the deceleration was from 40mph to 0 in just a few metres and doctors said she was very, very lucky to survive albeit with sever brain injuries. Bianchi was more than double that speed and quite frankly you do not survive that kind of deceleration. People quote the Richard Hammond accident but the truth is the main damage to him was done when the car decelerated from 150 to 110 in just a few meters when the roll bar dug in. The fact that the accident went on for another 100meters is what saved him as energy was dissipated and didn't go through his body.namao wrote:This halo thing can only be used to prevent these things...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4YlqJkn_JE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5DCNKBHZdw
Tyres impact...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uw-USwauS9s
Also Bianchi's crash might have not ended so bad.
Transparent bodywork anyone!? Can you make a strong enough composite that is also transparent.bauc wrote:This is correct, both eyes do create composite picture, but I think F1 can do better than this....COME ON F1, this is the best you HAVE? Really?bonjon1979 wrote:I think it looks fine. There won't be any massive issues with 'blind spots' as its right in between the two eyes meaning that you 'see through it'. In actual fact the right eye and left eye create a composite that gives you the whole picture rather than there being any kind of X ray vision! It might be distracting at first but nowhere near as distracting as a tyre in the face at 180mph
It didn't drop down from above it bounce off the tub and was moving up when it hit him.bonjon1979 wrote:That Spring wouldn't have got through. The car is going forwards at such a rate that as it dropped down from above it would pass through the line of the halo to intersect with the drivers head.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
