Are you referring to this?Diesel wrote:No that's incorrect, it's in the sporting regulations.SectorOne wrote:With regards to moving under braking there's a gentleman's agreement among all drivers that you do not, under any circumstances move during the braking phase.komninosm wrote:https://streamable.com/zdqo
Can you prove moving like that under breaking is illegal by the actual written rules?
Verstappen just chooses to ignore it. But it will be interesting to see what happens in the future because Whiting and the race stewards have talked to him this time. Wonder why..
Yes, and moving in braking zones is covered by that regulation. There's no gentlemen's agreement as such, it's more of a directive from the FIA which they can and do enforce under clause 27.8 of the sporting regulations.SectorOne wrote:
"Manoeuvres liable to hinder other drivers, such as deliberate crowding of a car beyond the
edge of the track or any other abnormal change of direction, are not permitted."
I´m talking about a specific agreement which is not in any regulations.
I guess he didn' t want to gain a price behind a stewards table. Seeing how much he is a Senna fan it wouldn't suprise me if he wasn't thinking of '89 and didn't want to be the Prost of this story. Fair to him.PlatinumZealot wrote:Hamilton has defended Verstappen again. At least he is consistent.
A. Situations were not the same (compared to Hungary and Spa), similar driving but considerably lesser transgression here. Just awkward and panicky, that's not how you should drive in F1 but at least only one late move this time.PlatinumZealot wrote:Hamilton has defended Verstappen again. At least he is consistent.
No need to get angry - it did sound like you were trying to set up an unfalsifiable argument (or trap as you called it), so thanks for pointing out that you were really only after analysis.komninosm wrote:Race stewards are very fallible, what I asked for was an analysis of actual written rules and video footage.zac510 wrote:Nobody can - only the race stewards can.komninosm wrote: https://streamable.com/zdqo
Can you prove moving like that under breaking is illegal by the actual written rules?
You're welcome to butt in with actual logical attempts to answer my question in SectorOne's place, but if you're just going to use worthless aphorisms please stay out of it.
(my question is serious and matter-a-fact, I'm not trying to "trap" SectorOne or argue with him pedantically)
We´re talking about two different things here.Diesel wrote:Yes, and moving in braking zones is covered by that regulation. There's no gentlemen's agreement as such, it's more of a directive from the FIA which they can and do enforce under clause 27.8 of the sporting regulations.SectorOne wrote:
"Manoeuvres liable to hinder other drivers, such as deliberate crowding of a car beyond the
edge of the track or any other abnormal change of direction, are not permitted."
I´m talking about a specific agreement which is not in any regulations.
I am not sure how many mortals can put forward performances like a 2014 and then a 2016 pre-summer. For someone who had loads of mentality issues in the past, to have kept composure and do what he has done, is in itself a huge achievement.Manoah2u wrote:Lewis definately making a mess of this weekend all by himself. Should have jumped back on as hard as he could, instead all i seen all weekend was a absolute mess. I don't know
where his head's at, but it's not where it should be. The press conference games were an odd thing to see the weekend start with but in the end a clear signal he's not doing what
he should - focusing completely on winning and surpassing himself. I don't know what that start was about but it was a real real mess. Atleast he admitted it was a screwup, but
well, he lost the race - and a more decent chance at the WDC - by that mess. I feel like it started with the 'test start' from the pitlane. he was taking a lot of time and though he got
away fairly well, it all seemed messy to me - or should i say, not flowing well.
Lewis, if you lose this WDC, you did it yourself with this weekend mate. Tech issues are out of your own league, but this was a model weekend to do all you could to still grab it.
Do you really think they would do this? Two questions: Are you a Hamilton fan? And is this a hunch, or do you have irrefutable proof? Because there's a glittering pattern of light reflection coming from the top of your head as you say this.GPR-A wrote:Congratulations to them, they have achieved something that no other team has done before. Engineering a championship win for the weaker driver !!!
Dont loose time trying to find sense to stupid comments of fan boys who cant accept that their idol can make mistakes.ChrisDanger wrote:Do you really think they would do this? Two questions: Are you a Hamilton fan? And is this a hunch, or do you have irrefutable proof? Because there's a glittering pattern of light reflection coming from the top of your head as you say this.GPR-A wrote:Congratulations to them, they have achieved something that no other team has done before. Engineering a championship win for the weaker driver !!!
They were clearly faster tan RB, so they should have finished 3th and 5th. They should have covered Sebastian´s position pitting earlier and using the hard tyres.zac510 wrote:If people really think Ferrari's strategy is bad then you must be over-rating their car. It's well clear of 4th best but finishing the race where it belongs. Strategy can't fix a slow car.