But maybe with the rumor that KFC is in talks with Manor if there's no seat at sauber maybe eh could land at manor...Joseki wrote:Pretty strong rumors today here in Italy: Giovinazzi is going to be announced soon as a Ferrari 3rd driver. Hopefully he'll land at Sauber for next year, but I suspect Wehrlein is the best candidate for the seat.
All big teams definitely looked at current success as well as having their future-reg-project alongside.basti313 wrote:I think this is not a valid comparison. For the last two rule changes we had teams with big budget working for years towards the rule change (Bull and Honda and then Merc) without looking at current success.
True. That was more the money. Big enhancement of the aero team and nearly unlimited funds over some years for the engine.SectorOne wrote:Mercedes was getting faster and faster and faster from 2010 to 2013 until the regulation change.basti313 wrote:I think this is not a valid comparison. For the last two rule changes we had teams with big budget working for years towards the rule change (Bull and Honda and then Merc) without looking at current success.
I will quote a wise person: "All big teams definitely looked at current success as well as having their future-reg-project alongside. "SectorOne wrote:Its true they started early but there´s nothing to say you can´t be a year ahead of everyone else aerodynamically in 2017.
True. But I do not see much room for big loopholes anymore. Every F1 journalist discussed the wheelbase already, so I do not think any big team missed to do this as well early enough.SectorOne wrote:Or probably more realistic, find something that others haven´t.
Also ture. But the big advantage will not vanish. Merc still has the strongest engine department and the others are in the hunt with weaker teams.SectorOne wrote:Engines for every year that pass should in theory converge which will only put more emphasis on aerodynamics.
Indeed.ClarkBT11 wrote:This is going off topic but Lewis could make his tyres go longer than nico so I think you are wrong. Lewis would take it easy for two laps when the tyres were new and then put in consistent fast laptimes. Williams weren't very good for tyre wear so we couldn't compare the two we still might not be able to next year or have I missed something?
I hope the tyres next year are the complete opposite and don't need TLC.
- Endless noise, decision has been made.lio007 wrote:Lauda & Marko on ServusTV a few minutes ago (some bits are already known):
- according to lauda all drivers from the grid made a call (incl. RIC & VES)
- RIC & VES have a contract til end of 2018
- driver decision will be made by Lauda and Wolff, no word on Paddy Lowe
- decision is expected by the end of January, maybe a little bit earlier
- the whole Merc team pretty unhappy with current situation
- Marko told about / confirmed an all-new Renault PU
Source?iotar__ wrote:- Endless noise, decision has been made.lio007 wrote:Lauda & Marko on ServusTV a few minutes ago (some bits are already known):
- according to lauda all drivers from the grid made a call (incl. RIC & VES)
- RIC & VES have a contract til end of 2018
- driver decision will be made by Lauda and Wolff, no word on Paddy Lowe
- decision is expected by the end of January, maybe a little bit earlier
- the whole Merc team pretty unhappy with current situation
- Marko told about / confirmed an all-new Renault PU
- I thought Lauda was non-executive?
- Re: bold part (contradictory). Did they call Merc with 'I have a contract' info ?
- Backslapping and playing along with each other BS. Tell us Renault/Merc/Red Bull engine story instead to cheer up "unhappy" team.