what we are seeing may well be in effect low-pass filtered ie what the ES 'sees' - and/or otherwise filtered by presentational practicalitiesringo wrote:It's pretty cool how the MGUs are synced with the gear changes so precisely. Especially the MGUH. I was expecting it to just be doing its own thing, since it's not mechanically coupled to the drive-train.
It may well be manipulating the compressor during gear changes, and possible the engine's back pressure.
Sasha, I don't know about Mercedes, but the honda graphs show that they prefer MGUH to Energy store more than MGUH to MGUK directly. I think Hasegawa confirmed this in one of the interviews. He said the MGUH is seen as "Thin and long" (As in lower power density that can be provided over a long period) and the battery as "Thick and short/long" ability to provide full 160hp in short bursts (or long burst). Honda found using the stronger bursts of power to produce quicker (or more efficient?) laptime so their main stragetyfor the MGUH is to use it to charge the batteries, and then use that energy for the MGUK at strategic parts of the lap.Sasha wrote:Sorry but everybody knew that(or had educated guess) from day one.The big secrets in 2014-2015 was the pre-chamber/trick injectors and MGU-H direct to MGU-K(bypassing the battery)...only MB got all those right from day one.Everybody will have it in 2017.Abarth wrote:Possibly so...Sasha wrote:Honda past history......when they release their Racing Engine specs/data.....that means they are done with it(design).
So that means the 2017 PU is 100% new design.
But that still doesn't invalidate many insights, some of them in the telemetry data. They obviously think that their competition uses the MGU's similarly and had no fear to publish it for the technically interested people. I applaud them for that.
We now can see (and confirm what some here have already stated) the MGU-H operation in race and qualification, and also the confirmation that MGU-K is used to increase load and charge the ES during part load operation.
Mr. PZ, you are correct. If Mercedes has a MGU-H to CE to MGU-K direct path, that must mean they are getting tremendous output from their MGU-H.PlatinumZealot wrote:Sasha, I don't know about Mercedes, but the honda graphs show that they prefer MGUH to Energy store more than MGUH to MGUK directly. I think Hasegawa confirmed this in one of the interviews. He said the MGUH is seen as "Thin and long" (As in lower power density that can be provided over a long period) and the battery as "Thick and short/long" ability to provide full 160hp in short bursts (or long burst). Honda found using the stronger bursts of power to produce quicker (or more efficient?) laptime so their main stragetyfor the MGUH is to use it to charge the batteries, and then use that energy for the MGUK at strategic parts of the lap.Sasha wrote:Sorry but everybody knew that(or had educated guess) from day one.The big secrets in 2014-2015 was the pre-chamber/trick injectors and MGU-H direct to MGU-K(bypassing the battery)...only MB got all those right from day one.Everybody will have it in 2017.Abarth wrote: Possibly so...
But that still doesn't invalidate many insights, some of them in the telemetry data. They obviously think that their competition uses the MGU's similarly and had no fear to publish it for the technically interested people. I applaud them for that.
We now can see (and confirm what some here have already stated) the MGU-H operation in race and qualification, and also the confirmation that MGU-K is used to increase load and charge the ES during part load operation.
Is it not possible to add battery energy too at the same time?Wazari wrote:Mr. PZ, you are correct. If Mercedes has a MGU-H to CE to MGU-K direct path, that must mean they are getting tremendous output from their MGU-H.
Yes they are.(MB)Wazari wrote:Mr. PZ, you are correct. If Mercedes has a MGU-H to CE to MGU-K direct path, that must mean they are getting tremendous output from their MGU-H.PlatinumZealot wrote:Sasha, I don't know about Mercedes, but the honda graphs show that they prefer MGUH to Energy store more than MGUH to MGUK directly. I think Hasegawa confirmed this in one of the interviews. He said the MGUH is seen as "Thin and long" (As in lower power density that can be provided over a long period) and the battery as "Thick and short/long" ability to provide full 160hp in short bursts (or long burst). Honda found using the stronger bursts of power to produce quicker (or more efficient?) laptime so their main stragetyfor the MGUH is to use it to charge the batteries, and then use that energy for the MGUK at strategic parts of the lap.Sasha wrote:
Sorry but everybody knew that(or had educated guess) from day one.The big secrets in 2014-2015 was the pre-chamber/trick injectors and MGU-H direct to MGU-K(bypassing the battery)...only MB got all those right from day one.Everybody will have it in 2017.
in principle surely yes, and you'd be crazy not to do this ? - can someone remind us of the K runtimes at 120 kW available within the laptime energy limits ?FW17 wrote:Is it not possible to add battery energy too at the same time? ..........Wazari wrote:Mr. PZ, you are correct. If Mercedes has a MGU-H to CE to MGU-K direct path, that must mean they are getting tremendous output from their MGU-H.
the MGUs can be swept electrically from eg 'full' generation condition to 'full' motoring condition in a few millisec - called the electromagnetic time constantgodlameroso wrote:I always wondered if the MGUs are fast enough to switch between harvesting and deploying in order to create throttle response with less "noise" that comes with brief compressor overboost, creep, or surge during gear changes or throttle modulation, or brief on and off throttle instances. The fact that they use a blow off valve on the intake, and wastegate on the exhaust leads me to believe that they actively try to control these phenomena. The telemetry hints that they could be using the MGUs as torque filtering, whether it's conductive to better harvesting I guess every little bit counts.
But in Honda's case the energy from the MGU-H to the MGU-K via the ES is limited to 4MJ - [mechanical energy recovered from braking] right? What is Honda doing with the rest of the MGU-H recovered energy (which can be as high as 5-6MJ based on Magneti Marelli data if I'm correct), or are they just not recovering that much?Wazari wrote:Mr. PZ, you are correct. If Mercedes has a MGU-H to CE to MGU-K direct path, that must mean they are getting tremendous output from their MGU-H.PlatinumZealot wrote:Sasha, I don't know about Mercedes, but the honda graphs show that they prefer MGUH to Energy store more than MGUH to MGUK directly. I think Hasegawa confirmed this in one of the interviews. He said the MGUH is seen as "Thin and long" (As in lower power density that can be provided over a long period) and the battery as "Thick and short/long" ability to provide full 160hp in short bursts (or long burst). Honda found using the stronger bursts of power to produce quicker (or more efficient?) laptime so their main stragetyfor the MGUH is to use it to charge the batteries, and then use that energy for the MGUK at strategic parts of the lap.Sasha wrote:
Sorry but everybody knew that(or had educated guess) from day one.The big secrets in 2014-2015 was the pre-chamber/trick injectors and MGU-H direct to MGU-K(bypassing the battery)...only MB got all those right from day one.Everybody will have it in 2017.
Something is not correct in this. In fully open throttle sections, engine speed varies a lot including decreasing.PlatinumZealot wrote:
If the MGU-k disengages, that will happen. Or in an uphill.vinuneuro wrote:Something is not correct in this. In fully open throttle sections, engine speed varies a lot including decreasing.PlatinumZealot wrote:Sasha wrote: