2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
Vladimir
Vladimir
-1
Joined: 06 Nov 2016, 11:43

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Mercedes still have qualifying advantage, but they will loose in race. Ferrari made the better race competitor this year.
Red Bull have more problems, not Renault PU only.
Hulkenberg result shows that. It will be interesting from Russian GP ,and latter Canadian when Renault planed big upgrades.

User avatar
iotar__
7
Joined: 28 Sep 2012, 12:31

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

- A bit like Aus,
- Ferrari - still the quickest
- wet race should be to their advantage
- I hope it's delayed anyway :idea: , too early
- Red Bull firmly 1,3 s behind

Wass85
Wass85
3
Joined: 01 Mar 2017, 22:11

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Did Hamilton leave a bit of time on the table in sector 3? He's usually the boss in that sector due to the big braking at the hairpin.

Bill_Kar
Bill_Kar
1
Joined: 02 Apr 2017, 09:38

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Before the start of Q3 everyone was like "Ferrari has the pole in their pockets".
After the end of Q3 everyone is like "Ferrari got this on Sunday".
I expect that if Mercedes wins, everyone is going to be like "Bahrain Ferrari has it, high temperatures"

Just calm a little bit.Ferrari is indeed stronger in race pace rather than qualifying, but Mercedes isn't a mule either.If they have figured out the tyre problem they faced in Australia, they still are the team to beat,albeit the gap is heavily chopped comparing to last few years.

In other news, I was impressed by both Hulkenberg and Stroll.I might say that Stroll will even fight with Massa in a few races, he had a nice session out there.Well, tomorrow is another day, though, to quote Sebastian.
What can we say about Fernando.The effort he's putting is extraordinary.When I heard about the ERS problem I thought here we go again, but It was really temporary.
It's a shame about Verstappen, but he's aggresive and he's gonna pick a lot of places, dry or wet.Unless of course he runs into somebody or something.
Last edited by Bill_Kar on 08 Apr 2017, 11:52, edited 1 time in total.

Wass85
Wass85
3
Joined: 01 Mar 2017, 22:11

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

GPR-A wrote:
08 Apr 2017, 10:42
Lewis did not have a good start to his final flier as he had to back off on the straight to stay clear of some of the midfield cars. That explains why he was slower in S1, compared to Bottas and Vettel, as the tires were probably not in the right temperature window.
Hamilton was quicker than Bottas in S1 on their best laps.

User avatar
JonoNic
4
Joined: 05 Mar 2015, 15:54

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Bill_Kar wrote:Before the start of Q3 everyone was like "Ferrari has the pole in their pockets".
After the end of Q3 everyone is like "Ferrari got this on Sunday".
I expect that if Mercedes wins, everyone is going to be like "Bahrain Ferrari has it, high temperatures"

Just calm a little bit.Ferrari is indeed stronger in race pace rather than qualifying, but Mercedes isn't a mule either.If they have figured out the tyre problem they faced in Australia, they still are the team to bit,albeit the gap is heavily chopped comparing to last few years.

In other news, I was impressed by both Hulkenberg and Stroll.I might say that Stroll will even fight with Massa in a few races, he had a nice session out there.Well, tomorrow is another day, though, to quote Sebastian.
What can we say about Fernando.The effort he's putting is extraordinary.When I heard about the ERS problem I thought here we go again, but It was really temporary.
It's a shame about Verstappen, but he's aggresive and he's gonna pick a lot of places, dry or wet.Unless of course he runs into somebody or something.
I don't mind my quali prediction being wrong or if Merc wins tomorrow. As long as we cannot predict a race then it stays exciting. Can't ask for more than that.

Sent from my SM-A700F using Tapatalk

Always find the gap then use it.

Bill_Kar
Bill_Kar
1
Joined: 02 Apr 2017, 09:38

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Wass85 wrote:
08 Apr 2017, 11:46
Did Hamilton leave a bit of time on the table in sector 3? He's usually the boss in that sector due to the big braking at the hairpin.
I had thought that.
-Hamilton did a mistake on his first run, so he couldn't be the usual aggressive Hamilton.
-Seeing his pole lap, through sector 3 he was a little bit cautious and he faced some oversteer heading to last corner.
-I believe there was another tenth out there to grasp, but he was really balanced, he couldn't risk another mistake and losing pole.

I have not seen Vettel's lap, so I can't really compare error-free what the gap is, but it was clear throughout Q3 that Ham had the upper hand.
Last edited by Bill_Kar on 08 Apr 2017, 12:12, edited 1 time in total.

Wass85
Wass85
3
Joined: 01 Mar 2017, 22:11

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Bill_Kar wrote:
08 Apr 2017, 11:51
Wass85 wrote:
08 Apr 2017, 11:46
Did Hamilton leave a bit of time on the table in sector 3? He's usually the boss in that sector due to the big braking at the hairpin.
I had thought that.
-Hamilton did a mistake on his first run, so he couldn't be the usual aggressive Hamilton.
-Seeing his pole lap, through sector 3 he was a little bit cautious and he faced some oversteer heading to last corner.
-I believe there was another tenth out there to grasp, but he was really balanced, he couldn't risk another mistake and losing pole.

I have not seen Vettel's lap, so I can really compare error-free what the gap is, but it was clear throughout Q3 that Ham had the upper hand.
I also don't think he expected anyone to really challenge him so he left some time there, I was surprised to see Bottas so close as his first 2 splits were showing he was way off.

Sevach
Sevach
1081
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/vett ... q3-891070/

Vettel also expecting to be a bit better in race trim.

psychemedia
psychemedia
0
Joined: 10 Apr 2015, 13:39

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Graphical review of qualifying:

Image

Session utilisation:

Image

Q1 cutoff evolution:

Image

Q2 cutoff evolution:

Image

Q3:

Image

Via: http://www.f1datajunkie.com/2017/04/f1- ... eview.html

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

by godlameroso » Tue Apr 04, 2017 9:17 pm
...turn 16 will definitely sort the men from the boys.

https://streamable.com/esaff

"The last corner, maybe I lost a little bit and chickened onto the brakes too soon." - Vettel
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
RZS10
359
Joined: 07 Dec 2013, 01:23

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Weird to see Grosjean penalized for this (especially after Hungary last year where it was established that a symbolic lift is enough for double yellows even when setting a purple sector)

https://twitter.com/RGrosjean/status/850666277400170496

Image

He clearly braked earlier and went through the whole section a lot slower, slowed down even more when passing the Sauber

Didn't the FIA say they want more consistency in their decisions?

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

godlameroso wrote:
08 Apr 2017, 14:49
by godlameroso » Tue Apr 04, 2017 9:17 pm
...turn 16 will definitely sort the men from the boys.

https://streamable.com/esaff

"The last corner, maybe I lost a little bit and chickened onto the brakes too soon." - Vettel
Vettel's radio:
“P2 Sebastian.”
Vettel: “How much was missing?”
“Less than two-tenths.”
“[Censored by FOM]. I didn’t have that. I didn’t have that it was a perfect lap, last corner I probably lost five-hundreths but it was a really good lap. We didn’t have that. Anyway the car was good. Grazie tutti, grande lavoro.”

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Bottas had a lot of problems with turn 16, might have been the sheet of paper difference between a 1st and second row start. I saw him struggle there in FP3.
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Juzh wrote:
08 Apr 2017, 17:04
godlameroso wrote:
08 Apr 2017, 14:49
by godlameroso » Tue Apr 04, 2017 9:17 pm
...turn 16 will definitely sort the men from the boys.

https://streamable.com/esaff

"The last corner, maybe I lost a little bit and chickened onto the brakes too soon." - Vettel
Vettel's radio:
“P2 Sebastian.”
Vettel: “How much was missing?”
“Less than two-tenths.”
“[Censored by FOM]. I didn’t have that. I didn’t have that it was a perfect lap, last corner I probably lost five-hundreths but it was a really good lap. We didn’t have that. Anyway the car was good. Grazie tutti, grande lavoro.”
I was just getting ready to point out the tweet from earlier was wrong.
201 105 104 9 9 7