When did I say that?Spoutnik wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 11:31Ferrari was the fastest car at Monza ? at Spa ? at Baku ? at Silverstone ?f1316 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 11:27No safety car, no rain, no particular attrition - Ferrari just can't catch a break; can't help but think of Spa last year, when Hamilton starting from the back, or Abu Dhabi 2012 when Vettel did it, and there were always nice safety cars. If we had got one today - pretty much at any point after Vettel got past Alonso - I think Seb might have won.
And Alonso... I just knew he'd get in Vettel's way, always does; he seems to have a deep resentment for him taking his seat and doing well and always makes it especially hard for him vs others.
All that said, if the Ferrari remains the fastest car everywhere we go - and turbo issue now out the way - 5 wins still guarantees Seb the title; so definitely not over and I suspect Mercedes are doing everything to look after their engine, but if we'd had a 'normal' couple of races, it would look very different.
Furthermore, do you really think Merc will be outperform by Ferrari on EVERY race till the end ?
Perhaps you misunderstood, let me try a different construction: if everywhere we go, Ferrari continues to be the fastest - as it has been in the last two races - then 5 wins guarantees Seb the title.
Point of fact: both Lewis and Seb argued the Ferrari was the quickest race car in Spa. In any case, I thought Mercedes would be the quickest car in Malaysia - I'm just saying IF (and it's a big if) - then at least it's still in their hands; Ferrari don't need to rely on dnf's or red bull just yet.
Another interesting thing from today is that A Renault engines car was capable of beating the works Mercedes on a track with long straights; that bodes well for McLaren if their chassis is as good as they say. The power gap is surmountable.