Helps having a 4 time champion at the peak of his powers as well.
Hamilton was passing cars left and right- he even made Verstappen look ordinary today..ringo wrote: ↑12 Nov 2017, 20:20No. im no Bottas fan, but he did the best he could chasing that ferrari. I don't think he could have got within 2 seconds.George-Jung wrote: ↑12 Nov 2017, 19:58Superb drive from Hamilton, just wow!
A shame he didn’t get a podium.
But what about Bottas, in the same car.. he really s#cks.
He wasn't great but he didn't suck. Hamilton would have at leasted pressured vettel into an error or pass vettel in the pits. Bottas is a good rear gunner, just not a star driver.
I was disapointed in his lack of bite, but mehh.. can't expect more.
Max looked ordinary today. Almost like a rookie.
I guess when he is on the leader's pace and doesn't have chassis advantage he gets miserable and kills his tyres.
Ricciardo seemed like the more mature and effective driver today.
Pretty sure it´s the other way round.
He wasn't under parc ferme rules. That was why he started in the pit lane.drunkf1fan wrote: ↑12 Nov 2017, 21:07I have no idea why you guys think he's not under parc ferme rules. First off, you can't just guess setup and get it bang on, the driver has to like how the car feels and know how to drive the car the way it feels, that is what comes from practice, so just arbitrarily guessing at a completely different setup would be suboptimal for the race than using a setup Hamilton had settled on and decided felt best to him. Secondly, he's under parc ferme rules the second he leaves the garage in qualifying. From that point they can't make setup changes and due to damage you can only replace like for like parts. Outside of a couple turns of the wing as you can do at pitstops there is little to nothing they can do so he had precisely zero advantage in changing the car setup for race only, that would only have been possible if they setup for the race with the pre-decided intention to skip qualifying.
Also as someone said after the race though I forget who, while Ham would have had more laps available to him on higher engine modes, the cars are still pretty heavily tire and fuel limited. Higher engine modes also use more fuel and higher speeds still push more tire wear, pushing as hard as he did took a lot of tires out of the life and you can't just take it easier in corners and say drop a second a lap in corners to save tire life and make it up with a higher engine mode because then you'd run out of fuel. There was certain an engine advantage but it wasn't that big because engine modes aren't at all the only limitation.
The main reason Hamilton was so fast is.... Hamilton is that fast. He's absolutely killing Bottas in track speed and for the same reason Vettel staying ahead of a faster car isn't impressive.
Hamilton easily finished Cota 10 seconds ahead of a Vettel who led the early part of the race yet Bottas wasn't even in contention for 4th place. That's like saying well done for Vettel for beating Bottas in Cota, because he had the slower car.
A car's pace is both what the car can do and how much of that the driver can extract. Every driver says they are pushing after a race because saying it was a painfully easy cruise with no competition upsets fans(they like to believe it's closer than it is). Bottas + Merc isn't anywhere near the same ballpark as Hamilton + Merc. Ham + Merc was faster than Vettel + Ferrari, but Vet/ferrari was faster than Bottas/Merc. Bottas was probably pushing considerably harder than Vettel was. IMO Vettel was in complete control with Hamilton starting so far back and he was just trying to ease Bottas into Kimi to potentially create a 1-2 for Ferrari. I suspect had Hamilton passed Kimi and Bottas with 5 laps to go Vettel would have just ease off into the distance.
Pretty much everything, then.
And in other similar situations he was too agressive, touching others around. It seems when it really comes down to it and split second decisions need to be made he just doesn't have that edge. He was Ok this weekend, just not great.Restomaniac wrote: ↑12 Nov 2017, 20:25The problem is that Bottas is too passive at times.ringo wrote: ↑12 Nov 2017, 20:20No. im no Bottas fan, but he did the best he could chasing that ferrari. I don't think he could have got within 2 seconds.George-Jung wrote: ↑12 Nov 2017, 19:58Superb drive from Hamilton, just wow!
A shame he didn’t get a podium.
But what about Bottas, in the same car.. he really s#cks.
He wasn't great but he didn't suck. Hamilton would have at leasted pressured vettel into an error or pass vettel in the pits. Bottas is a good rear gunner, just not a star driver.
I was disapointed in his lack of bite, but mehh.. can't expect more.
Look at turn 1 today. On that first lap he pretty much waved Vettel through.
Indeed.Sieper wrote: ↑12 Nov 2017, 21:49And in other similar situations he was too agressive, touching others around. It seems when it really comes down to it and split second decisions need to be made he just doesn't have that edge. He was Ok this weekend, just not great.Restomaniac wrote: ↑12 Nov 2017, 20:25The problem is that Bottas is too passive at times.ringo wrote: ↑12 Nov 2017, 20:20
No. im no Bottas fan, but he did the best he could chasing that ferrari. I don't think he could have got within 2 seconds.
He wasn't great but he didn't suck. Hamilton would have at leasted pressured vettel into an error or pass vettel in the pits. Bottas is a good rear gunner, just not a star driver.
I was disapointed in his lack of bite, but mehh.. can't expect more.
Look at turn 1 today. On that first lap he pretty much waved Vettel through.