Yes that and The Mercedes AMG Wo 9 EQ power Plus car is 0.5sec per lap slower than Ferrari in China.wesley123 wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 12:28Only Hamiltons performance is the deal here imo. He did everything perfectly in Australia but was screwed over by a tactical error, and in Bahrain he was required a gearbox change, in a car that ran the most laps in winter testing without any issues. Hamilton is one driver on the grid who seems to be negatively affected by such events.
They were by quite a margin the quickest in Australia, and Bottas is around where you expect them to be. So I don't think there is anything actually going on at Mercedes.
Racecraft. It's way too often that Bottas is sleeping or not daring an overtake, in Bahrain that shouldn't have been much of an issue considering the grip Bottas had over Vettel.
Yes, and Mercedes lost a full second in two weeks. Sorry, but no. Hamilton has been outqualified by his teammate twice and is clearly lacking performance.Chene_Mostert wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 12:31Yes that and The Mercedes AMG Wo 9 EQ power Plus car is 0.5sec per lap slower than Ferrari in China.wesley123 wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 12:28Only Hamiltons performance is the deal here imo. He did everything perfectly in Australia but was screwed over by a tactical error, and in Bahrain he was required a gearbox change, in a car that ran the most laps in winter testing without any issues. Hamilton is one driver on the grid who seems to be negatively affected by such events.
They were by quite a margin the quickest in Australia, and Bottas is around where you expect them to be. So I don't think there is anything actually going on at Mercedes.
No, Ferrari gained a full second from 2017. Mercedes not. Its often said Australia is not a representative track.wesley123 wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 12:37Yes, and Mercedes lost a full second in two weeks. Sorry, but no. Hamilton has been outqualified by his teammate twice and is clearly lacking performance.Chene_Mostert wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 12:31Yes that and The Mercedes AMG Wo 9 EQ power Plus car is 0.5sec per lap slower than Ferrari in China.wesley123 wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 12:28Only Hamiltons performance is the deal here imo. He did everything perfectly in Australia but was screwed over by a tactical error, and in Bahrain he was required a gearbox change, in a car that ran the most laps in winter testing without any issues. Hamilton is one driver on the grid who seems to be negatively affected by such events.
They were by quite a margin the quickest in Australia, and Bottas is around where you expect them to be. So I don't think there is anything actually going on at Mercedes.
Maybe Ferrari would still have qualified on pole, but the gap isn't that big as it appears to be
Algorithms suggested something different?De Jokke wrote:Are merc morrons? Everyone could see that they had to pit Lewis with the SC as RBR obviously did with their drivers. Another victory squandered...
Well Lewis did have 5 hard laps on that remaining set of softs he had. He'd loose track position and be at a disadvantage near the end of the race. If that happened, people would point at Kimi and say - Mercedes should have kept Hamilton out, look what Kimi did by staying out.
It's representative enough to see that the 1s merc lost isn't in the car alone. You don't just lose a second in two weeksChene_Mostert wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 12:40No, Ferrari gained a full second from 2017. Mercedes not. Its often said Australia is not a representative track.
+1 this.Chene_Mostert wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 12:40wesley123 wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 12:37Chene_Mostert wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 12:31
Yes that and The Mercedes AMG Wo 9 EQ power Plus car is 0.5sec per lap slower than Ferrari in China.
Yes, and Mercedes lost a full second in two weeks. Sorry, but no. Hamilton has been outqualified by his teammate twice and is clearly lacking performance.
Maybe Ferrari would still have qualified on pole, but the gap isn't that big as it appears to be
No, Ferrari gained a full second from 2017. Mercedes not. Its often said Australia is not a representative track.