I don't think it is motivation he has lost so much as focus.
He has too many outside interests and needs to refocus on being the best driver he can be.
Mercedes has had no issues with drivers battling each other, so in theory there would have been place for another WDC.Andres125sx wrote: ↑14 Jun 2018, 19:20And you didn´t learn the leasson?
He has no options because Ferrari has Vettel, Mercedes Hamilton, and RBR Max and Ricciardo apart from they rarely hire outside drivers, but you´re assuming he painted himself into a corner (I got it at first, but thanks for the link anyway), even when he´s driving for a team you did assume would never hire him again.
He´s very demanding, ok, but only because he always perform and he want his team to perform similar. Nothing a top team would be afraid about if they´re aiming the titles
Not that old line again. Other drivers have families which are also time consuming and take focus away. Hamilton has always said that the stuff he does outside of F1 recharges him mentally which helps him be focussed "at work".
It's something which extends to many sportspeople - if I can see what you're doing outside of the sport, you're not focused. If I have no idea what you're doing, I'll assume you're focused.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑15 Jun 2018, 10:28Not that old line again. Other drivers have families which are also time consuming and take focus away. Hamilton has always said that the stuff he does outside of F1 recharges him mentally which helps him be focussed "at work".
In theory. In the real world they´re winning both titles since 2014, so it would be utter nosense to pay another top salary... for what exactly? They can´t do it any better. Actually I´ve think more than once they (before 2018) sandbag usually to keep a false feeling of competition, when they could have anihilated the rest of the field, but that would have promoted some rule changes from FIAwesley123 wrote: ↑15 Jun 2018, 09:25Mercedes has had no issues with drivers battling each other, so in theory there would have been place for another WDC.Andres125sx wrote: ↑14 Jun 2018, 19:20And you didn´t learn the leasson?
He has no options because Ferrari has Vettel, Mercedes Hamilton, and RBR Max and Ricciardo apart from they rarely hire outside drivers, but you´re assuming he painted himself into a corner (I got it at first, but thanks for the link anyway), even when he´s driving for a team you did assume would never hire him again.
He´s very demanding, ok, but only because he always perform and he want his team to perform similar. Nothing a top team would be afraid about if they´re aiming the titles
Can you please provide some source to prove this is NOT an unfounded myth?
+2.Andres125sx wrote: ↑15 Jun 2018, 18:29In theory. In the real world they´re winning both titles since 2014, so it would be utter nosense to pay another top salary... for what exactly? They can´t do it any better. Actually I´ve think more than once they (before 2018) sandbag usually to keep a false feeling of competition, when they could have anihilated the rest of the field, but that would have promoted some rule changes from FIAwesley123 wrote: ↑15 Jun 2018, 09:25Mercedes has had no issues with drivers battling each other, so in theory there would have been place for another WDC.Andres125sx wrote: ↑14 Jun 2018, 19:20And you didn´t learn the leasson?
He has no options because Ferrari has Vettel, Mercedes Hamilton, and RBR Max and Ricciardo apart from they rarely hire outside drivers, but you´re assuming he painted himself into a corner (I got it at first, but thanks for the link anyway), even when he´s driving for a team you did assume would never hire him again.
He´s very demanding, ok, but only because he always perform and he want his team to perform similar. Nothing a top team would be afraid about if they´re aiming the titles
Can you please provide some source to prove this is NOT an unfounded myth?
Yes bookmaker odds are giving Hamilton the edge, though a mild one. And Mercedes is almost certain to win the WCC, which means either Mercedes has the better car (combination of reliability and pace) or their combination of car and drivers is better in sum compared to Ferrari. (to put in laymans terms: Kimi is costing Ferrari the WCC if Ferrari has the better car)Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Jun 2018, 21:50Really? He's going to need something to start going well for him for that to be the case. The Ferrari is the better car and Vettel is definitely more than capable of making full use of it.
Alonso could never go to Mercedes because he is black listed there. He cost them 100 million and Dr. Z will never forget that. I really laugh any time i read such statements.Manoah2u wrote: ↑15 Jun 2018, 19:30
Things would be pretty different, wouldn't it, if it was Alonso who would have signed with Mercedes instead of Lewis, and Lewis would have either stayed with Mclaren (would have been career suicide), or went to Ferrari (and remain inevitably dry). Or if Alonso actually would have signed with Brawn and dominated the 2009 season.
I don't remember the situation, why he costed 100m to Merc?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 03:03Alonso could never go to Mercedes because he is black listed there. He cost them 100 million and Dr. Z will never forget that. I really laugh any time i read such statements.Manoah2u wrote: ↑15 Jun 2018, 19:30
Things would be pretty different, wouldn't it, if it was Alonso who would have signed with Mercedes instead of Lewis, and Lewis would have either stayed with Mclaren (would have been career suicide), or went to Ferrari (and remain inevitably dry). Or if Alonso actually would have signed with Brawn and dominated the 2009 season.
His testimony and providing the emails for the spy gate during the 2007 season, which was one of the reasons for Mercedes to sell McLaren and start their own team. Mercedes felt betrayed.probenprinz wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 11:52I don't remember the situation, why he costed 100m to Merc?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 03:03Alonso could never go to Mercedes because he is black listed there. He cost them 100 million and Dr. Z will never forget that. I really laugh any time i read such statements.Manoah2u wrote: ↑15 Jun 2018, 19:30
Things would be pretty different, wouldn't it, if it was Alonso who would have signed with Mercedes instead of Lewis, and Lewis would have either stayed with Mclaren (would have been career suicide), or went to Ferrari (and remain inevitably dry). Or if Alonso actually would have signed with Brawn and dominated the 2009 season.
i laugh really hard any time i read posts like yours.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 03:03Alonso could never go to Mercedes because he is black listed there. He cost them 100 million and Dr. Z will never forget that. I really laugh any time i read such statements.