Intriguing...
China would like a wordLM10 wrote: ↑24 Jun 2018, 11:33Me discounting Melbourne is even in favor of the arguments that Ferrari was having an engine advantage early season. If so, where was that advantage in Melbourne then? Let's say Bottas would have been half a second faster than the fastest Ferrari. Seems awful lot against a car with a more powerful engine, don't you think?
I think you've successfully established your position though. Ferrari gains/losses in performance are down to a number of factors, not least engines not losing any performance through their lifespan and Ferrari downforce not creating drag. Mercedes gains/losses in performance are down purely to the tyres.
I think we should agree to differ.
- - -
As to the race, what was Grosjean doing at the start? Just a pointless contact! He really needs to reset himself and, instead, he just keeps piling more and pressure on himself.
Vettel boxed by the Mercs (I assume in a pre-planned move) but he pulls off a classic Seb 'love tap' to deal with Bottas and then evens up his front wing by doing a karmic repetition on Grosjean. That said, it was a really solid recovery drive and he stood up and took responsiblity for the Bottas incident so fair play to him. Plenty of other drivers would find excuses for that sort of collision and I probably would have ruled it a racing incident.
And poor Sainz. Just another minute or two and VSC would have bought him enough time to finish in a very good position. Slightly worrying for the Non-Ferrari manufacturers that they have engine woes this early in the lifetime of the new units.