No
No
Strange that you mention him but seem to be totally ignoring the fact that Vettel himself debunked the whole idea.LM10 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 14:12Vettel was the fastest driver after the two Mercedes drivers. And he is the biggest and hardest contender of Lewis. Of course I'm gonna mention him.GrandAxe wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 14:03This has got to be a joke. So, its all about Vettel and Ferrari, whereas there are 10 teams and 20 cars on the grid?LM10 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 13:47
I can't provide you with facts. None of us can.
There are two options: Either you think that Mercedes' massive performance jumps in Barcelona and Paul Ricard were up to their upgrades or you think that it mainly were the tyres. Lewis' pole time in France was 4 tenths faster than Vettel's and Lewis could have been even faster for about 3 tenths. Do you think that Mercedes would be 7 tenths faster than Ferrari on pure performance?
Come on, this is trolling.
That tidbit of information doesn't fit the narrative they want to write!Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 17:47Strange that you mention him but seem to be totally ignoring the fact that Vettel himself debunked the whole idea.
Let's talk about the other cars then. I don't see any difference when I look at the qualifying times. The top teams were more than a second faster than the rest, as usual. If there was a team in midfield which managed to be faster on the special tyres than on the normal ones, good for them. But I don't understand what kind of an effect this would have on the top teams? If you accuse me of trying to tell that those tyres were specially created to suit Mercedes then you're wrong. What I mean is that Mercedes obviously seems to be quite comfortable on them and I come to this conclusion by comparing their performance on the normal tyres with the one on the special tyres. Both times Ferrari and RBR weren't even close to be challenging Mercedes even though on every other race weekend Mercedes had a really hard time.GrandAxe wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 14:56I see. Out of twenty cars, you compare just two and make conclusions that defy logic. Two cars out of twenty is a meagre 10 percent of the data. Of course other "minor" matters don't count too; things like, car setup, inherent characteristics, driver idiosyncrasies, luck, motivation, hard evidence from the last Pirelli test etc.
Removing Merc and Ferrari, were the other 8 teams running around on something other than the same tyres, perhaps like Fred Flintsone and the other fortunate drivers in Bedrock do?
Please, lets move on from this and talk Austria.
Indeeddans79 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 18:04That tidbit of information doesn't fit the narrative they want to write!Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 17:47Strange that you mention him but seem to be totally ignoring the fact that Vettel himself debunked the whole idea.
I don't ignore it. Ferrari struggling does not change the fact that Mercedes seems to be more comfortable on those tyres than on the usual ones.dans79 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 18:04That tidbit of information doesn't fit the narrative they want to write!Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 17:47Strange that you mention him but seem to be totally ignoring the fact that Vettel himself debunked the whole idea.
And Canada proves that right?LM10 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 18:49I don't ignore it. Ferrari struggling does not change the fact that Mercedes seems to be more comfortable on those tyres than on the usual ones.dans79 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 18:04That tidbit of information doesn't fit the narrative they want to write!Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 17:47Strange that you mention him but seem to be totally ignoring the fact that Vettel himself debunked the whole idea.
Then Explain Australia, where Mercedes has the greatest advantage!LM10 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 18:49I don't ignore it. Ferrari struggling does not change the fact that Mercedes seems to be more comfortable on those tyres than on the usual ones.dans79 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 18:04That tidbit of information doesn't fit the narrative they want to write!Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 17:47Strange that you mention him but seem to be totally ignoring the fact that Vettel himself debunked the whole idea.
1 out of 6 times on the usual tyres this season. Mercedes, the qualifying masters, were just able to be on pole once and you're still asking me for explanations.dans79 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 19:48Then Explain Australia, where Mercedes has the greatest advantage!
https://image.ibb.co/dcaCLT/qual.jpg
Maybe Ferrari was struggling with their longwheel base?don't you think so?dans79 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 19:48Then Explain Australia, where Mercedes has the greatest advantage!
https://image.ibb.co/dcaCLT/qual.jpg
Easy, Monaco Merc has always struggled. Canada the advantage was PU, the fact that Mercedes was as close as they were with an aging PU and the "bad" tires should wipe away any question but it doesn't. Because forums aren't know for people changing their opinions.LM10 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 19:571 out of 6 times on the usual tyres this season. Mercedes, the qualifying masters, were just able to be on pole once and you're still asking me for explanations.dans79 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 19:48Then Explain Australia, where Mercedes has the greatest advantage!
https://image.ibb.co/dcaCLT/qual.jpg
In Melbourne Hamilton and Vettel were on par after their first Q3 runs, if you remember. I have absolutely no idea how Hamilton managed to do this crazy lap on his second run, but I already told that it was Hammertime in my opinion. He nailed it, respect for that. He was already massively in front after the first turn! No secret that it's his turn.
You missed the point completely! He wasn't just on pole he was on pole by the largest margin of the season, and on the tires so many claim don't suit them as well. Yet, some people go on and on throwing out all kinds of innuendo, about the special tires. Even though Vettel himself said post race Spain testing that the tires where not the Ferrari issue in Spain.
You clearly are seeing as Vettel admitted that Ferrari ‘seemed to be more comfortable on those tyres than the usual ones’ to use your words.LM10 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 18:49I don't ignore it. Ferrari struggling does not change the fact that Mercedes seems to be more comfortable on those tyres than on the usual ones.dans79 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 18:04That tidbit of information doesn't fit the narrative they want to write!Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 17:47Strange that you mention him but seem to be totally ignoring the fact that Vettel himself debunked the whole idea.