Like last year's softs
Because as far I can see here Arribabene has not said anytying about the aero package.dans79 wrote: β03 Jul 2018, 17:02Maybe by how bad it might be!
http://www.grandprix.com/news/ferrari-c ... stone.htmlI Can't remember Arrivabene ever making a statement like this prior to the weekend."On paper, Silverstone looks quite difficult for us. Aerodynamics are very important and it will be a difficult race for us, so we have to stay focused," Arrivabene told Sky Italia.
Have you read the analysis by Mark Hughes and Giorgio Piola on Merc's new update?Vanja #66 wrote: β03 Jul 2018, 23:37More downforce and more drag combined with a bit more power from PU makes you faster in S3. S2 for Ferrari is down to aero efficiency, better acceleration due to less drag.
Also, Merc looked like it didn't roll at all in corners 9 and 10, which is what they are working on for a number of years. Other then all this, they were able to extract maximum from tyres in Qualy, their pace in the race was not that better then competition in the first stint (primarily Max, Kimi kept steadily loosing a few tenths every lap, and the same for Dani Ric and Vettel because of Kimi in front of them). Needless to discuss second stint.
That's just my view, let's turn towards the Cradle of F1.
huh?Vasconia wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 08:25Because as far I can see here Arribabene has not said anytying about the aero package.
http://formula1.ferrari.com/en/f1-2018- ... e-comment/
No, I haven't and I don't plan to read those anymore. Their credibility was standing on glass legs even before their piece on Ferrari wing mirrors directing air into top inlet. After that, it was shattered beyond repair.zibby43 wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 09:15Have you read the analysis by Mark Hughes and Giorgio Piola on Merc's new update?
They heaped a ton of praise on Merc's ability to come up with an upgrade that 1) increases downforce and 2) decreases drag.
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/tech ... rhaul.html
Excerpt:
"The latest Mercedes sidepod changes stop short of adopting the Ferrari-style geometry, which would have necessitated lowering the upper side impact bars, which in turn would have required changes to the shape of the monocoque. But what they have done whilst retaining the previous position of the bars moves it towards the Ferrari philosophy.
The gentler transition of the bargeboard footplate will likely also create less drag. So the combined effect of the whole change could even be more downforce and less drag, a rarely-achieved holy grail for an F1 aerodynamicist - usually extra downforce comes at the expense of extra drag."
Whoa, easy there. Just asking a question lol. I mean, I was impressed that the gap in qualifying was as big as it was on a track where I expected to measure the gap in hundredths, not tenths.Vanja #66 wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 10:12No, I haven't and I don't plan to read those anymore. Their credibility was standing on glass legs even before their piece on Ferrari wing mirrors directing air into top inlet. After that, it was shattered beyond repair.zibby43 wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 09:15Have you read the analysis by Mark Hughes and Giorgio Piola on Merc's new update?
They heaped a ton of praise on Merc's ability to come up with an upgrade that 1) increases downforce and 2) decreases drag.
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/tech ... rhaul.html
Excerpt:
"The latest Mercedes sidepod changes stop short of adopting the Ferrari-style geometry, which would have necessitated lowering the upper side impact bars, which in turn would have required changes to the shape of the monocoque. But what they have done whilst retaining the previous position of the bars moves it towards the Ferrari philosophy.
The gentler transition of the bargeboard footplate will likely also create less drag. So the combined effect of the whole change could even be more downforce and less drag, a rarely-achieved holy grail for an F1 aerodynamicist - usually extra downforce comes at the expense of extra drag."
I've already said in W09 thread that this update is looking bigger than it is and Mercedes obviously didn't gain 3-4 tenths from France to Austria with it. It's an improvement, no doubt, but not a huge one in any way.
In this official statement he doesnΒ΄t mention the aero thing. I was just pointing out this.dans79 wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 09:41huh?Vasconia wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 08:25Because as far I can see here Arribabene has not said anytying about the aero package.
http://formula1.ferrari.com/en/f1-2018- ... e-comment/
Well the aero thing will most likely be a very small change just like in most of the previous races.Vasconia wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 11:04In this official statement he doesnΒ΄t mention the aero thing. I was just pointing out this.dans79 wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 09:41huh?Vasconia wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 08:25Because as far I can see here Arribabene has not said anytying about the aero package.
http://formula1.ferrari.com/en/f1-2018- ... e-comment/
I don't remember how many times we heard Hamilton claiming in the radio that he was facing troubles (tyre degradation or loss of power) and in the same time he slamed the lap record of the race!
I wonder if the competition will update their strategies knowingly to disrupt their races using this weakness. Apparently Merc cannot overtake, so anytime there is a track advantage vs fresh tires, I bet other teams will choose track advantage.Schumix wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 11:19I don't remember how many times we heard Hamilton claiming in the radio that he was facing troubles (tyre degradation or loss of power) and in the same time he slamed the lap record of the race!
Whatever is the reason, any race driver can be overtaken and defeated as it was the case for Hamilton.
The understanding of some technical people now is that Mercedes brought major upgrades that really work great but in the same time these upgrades apply too much load and stress on the tyres and the whole package. This is why they are in trouble in dirty air. When they are in clean air in front of the race, they achieve to manage their tyres whatever the type is.
Their opponents know that Mercedes is on the edge for the tyre management in dirty air and they will make the most of it by pushing them. It is so simple...
If it's a major update (measured in lap time) it wouldn't be too difficult for more than some technical people to name elements of it and at least start a discussion. Until then: Canada - lack of updates (disregard Bottas), Austria - too much updates .F1Krof wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 12:04I wonder if the competition will update their strategies knowingly to disrupt their races using this weakness. Apparently Merc cannot overtake, so anytime there is a track advantage vs fresh tires, I bet other teams will choose track advantage.Schumix wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 11:19I don't remember how many times we heard Hamilton claiming in the radio that he was facing troubles (tyre degradation or loss of power) and in the same time he slamed the lap record of the race!
Whatever is the reason, any race driver can be overtaken and defeated as it was the case for Hamilton.
The understanding of some technical people now is that Mercedes brought major upgrades that really work great but in the same time these upgrades apply too much load and stress on the tyres and the whole package. This is why they are in trouble in dirty air. When they are in clean air in front of the race, they achieve to manage their tyres whatever the type is.
Their opponents know that Mercedes is on the edge for the tyre management in dirty air and they will make the most of it by pushing them. It is so simple...
The power loss issue 90% are derating issue from the engine....u have an assumption that any such problem is not fixable but in fact it is through calibration of harvesting and power delievry of MGUk and mguh etc. So there is no problem in setting fastest laps when this issue is solved......also as the race goes on fuel runs out and tyres come back to window etc. So there is nothing sinister about the power tyre issues in one part of the race and later setting a good lap.Schumix wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 11:19I don't remember how many times we heard Hamilton claiming in the radio that he was facing troubles (tyre degradation or loss of power) and in the same time he slamed the lap record of the race!
Do you mean Ferrari shouldn't bring updates to Silverstone or for the remaining season?FrukostScones wrote: β04 Jul 2018, 12:58Ferrari update for Silverstone? Always was a step back or in the wrong direction. Car is fine, they should not do a thing.
I think with all this aero and Turn 1 DRS RedBull will be able to fine tune their car for another VES victory despite the tyre compounds and tread thickness. Lets hope it will still be scorching hot with mad climax thunderstorms and ALO finishing on the podium.