If a driver does not realise someone is almost interlocked wheels with them, well, maybe they are not cut out for racing.
I can not see it any other way than deliberate. When taken in account of the other one, something has fazed Chico.
Just try to avoid Sky F1 analysis as much as possible. It tends to be packed to the rafters with click bait booby traps and click bait attracting characters.ispano6 wrote: ↑17 Sep 2018, 01:38wish Martin Bundle could be replaced! Tired of him saying "for good measure". It's so annoying that anyone I hear say it just sounds like a fool with no vocabulary. If you've got nothing to say don't say anything. His commentating is so stale and irrelevant, I'd rather just listen to pit and driver radio.
Yet he is still only 1 point in front of his much more junior teammate, even though Ocon has 4 dnfs to Perez's 1.
It's called being teamed with a driver who is younger and better!
But that does not make you crash into other drivers. OK, his team mate could be 'personal' but to swipe against another competitor just because you cannot get past within the rules is stupid. Other teams all take note of things like this ready for next year and the year after. No way to wipe that off now.
Thanks. I guess Ferrari surprisingly stating that Leclerc is a long term investment while Vettel is still in his prime sort of shows their hand. Their recent practice of allowing Kimi race freely and not wrecking his races to suit Vettel would also hint strongly at the same suspicions.Sierra117 wrote: ↑16 Sep 2018, 20:26He was asked about how Vettel said he prefers Kimi because he's worked with him for a long time and whether that makes a difference to the choice regarding Charles. Arrivabene said no Sebastian is a driver and not the team principal. Now if you just read it, seems all fine and dandy. But the way he said it, his facial expression, the delivery, the tone of voice and, if I remember correctly, a slight scoff of disbelief, it was a really soul crushing thing to hear, as if he had zero respect for Vettel. Maybe I'm exaggerating but when I heard it live I was like Holy ... that hurts.GrandAxe wrote: ↑16 Sep 2018, 18:07Really! I missed that, what did Arrivabene say?Sierra117 wrote: ↑16 Sep 2018, 18:04
Man, for me, when Arrivabene rebuked Vettel during quali ... that set off alarm bells in my head. A driver's focus goes to hell if your team boss says something so cold on live TV. Compare that to the relationship between Toto and Lewis, even during the 2016 season. I think the strongest word from Toto was when Nico and Hamilton came together - "mindless".
I think you're overanalyzing. You could probably look at every other on-board from drivers driving through that corner and see that there will be moments when the drivers are straightening their steering momentarily either to follow the natural progression of the track/corner and as a result of balancing the car while on full-throttle and accelerating out of the corner. At full tilt, you want the car balanced for maximum traction, not steering/cornering.foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑17 Sep 2018, 16:51Watch again. He just changes direction he is not trying to correct an oversteer or anything. The onboards show it clearly. There was malicious intent.
After reading your post I was reminded of a quote by Nico Rosberg earlier this year, he basically stated that you have to not only be quick but also consistent and error free to beat Hamilton over a whole season. He would know best of all just how hard it was to finish ahead of him and but for a little fortune even his best efforts would not have been enough. Anybody trying to win the WDC whilst Hamilton is in one of the top three cars would struggle to match his season long commitment.LM10 wrote: ↑17 Sep 2018, 18:36I didn’t watch any minute of the Singapore weekend, neither practice, nor qualifying or race. Just from looking at the times from practice I think it was not just me who thought that Ferrari was in a kind of a favorite role, especially after FP3.
I don’t know if Ferrari had the potential to get pole at the end (I think that’s what they told?), but nonetheless my huge respect goes to Hamilton. He absolutely nailed it and just deserved winning. Most constant driver (at highest level) throughout whole season and even keeps on increasing his performance.
I don’t think that Vettel has got a realistically huge chance of winning the WDC anymore. Ferrari will not really be defeated by Mercedes which has been the case in recent years, but by the combination Hamilton-Mercedes. Unless Hamilton is on such a constant level, you can’t afford doing so many mistakes like Ferrari as a team and Vettel have done. Needs to be said, sadly.
As a fan, I’m gonna hope for a better next season.
The mouth speaking of the true sinner. Amen!LM10 wrote: ↑17 Sep 2018, 18:36I didn’t watch any minute of the Singapore weekend, neither practice, nor qualifying or race. Just from looking at the times from practice I think it was not just me who thought that Ferrari was in a kind of a favorite role, especially after FP3.
I don’t know if Ferrari had the potential to get pole at the end (I think that’s what they told?), but nonetheless, my huge respect goes to Hamilton. He absolutely nailed it and just deserved winning. Most constant driver (at highest level) throughout whole season and even keeps on increasing his performance.
I don’t think that Vettel has got a realistically huge chance of winning the WDC anymore. Ferrari will not really be defeated by Mercedes which has been the case in recent years, but by the combination Hamilton-Mercedes. Unless Hamilton is on such a constant level, you can’t afford doing so many mistakes like Ferrari as a team and Vettel have done. Needs to be said, sadly.
As a fan, I’m gonna hope for a better next season.