Most convenient excuses that people have found out to hide the inefficiency of 500+ people who work to create a F1 car. In the modern times of F1 racing, teams have such sophisticated tools (cars laden with thousands of sensors), to the extent that they even know when a driver is going to pee, before the driver feels it. To then blame the driver for having lead them to create dogs, can at the least be termed as out rightly ridiculous. You should blame the problems of Ferrari to their own way of working.ringo wrote: ↑02 Apr 2019, 06:44His abilities to win is not the issue here. I agree with what you are saying regarding his abilities.
It's his stifling personality that engulfs a team is the problem. He will play politics around young leclerc.
Alonso is the Tantalus of Formula 1.
Has the talent and skill, but when he goes into a team the car turns to a dog. When he leaves the team, the car turns to a winner.
When he joins a team and get a winning car... he gets a once in every 25 years prodigy as a teammate. He's cursed!
McLaren was already sliding downwards by the time he joined. He joined with full understanding of the situation as he had experienced the fact that, at that point, Ferrari weren't in a position to create a winning car. He can only be blamed for his untimely choices, but to make him a scapegoat for the inefficiencies of a large racing team, is just too convenient.
He is also responsible for McLaren getting back to shape this year as he has been involved in their decision making. He is testing the car for them, despite not driving full time, which shows his level of involvement and commitment.
McLaren also created dog of a car in 2009 and 2011, did anyone blame Hamilton for that? They did that in 2013 and 2014. Did anyone blame Button for that?
2007 can always be debated in multiple different ways, depending upon who you want to represent.