Yep, it’s like they have made their car as fast as posssible in a straight line and just totally misjudged what they need to actually turn corners. That’s why I’m questioning the whole ‘Super-duper powerful engine’ argument. If Mercedes had shown the same problems in cornering then it may be more valid.GPR -A wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 13:31First off, Bahrain and China are actually, relatively low downforce circuits! China is so much more front limited and doesn't demand a whole lot from the rear.Restomaniac wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 13:14The thing is that if they start bolting downforce on then how much of their straight line advantage will they lose?
If NIco's statement there is believable, then one would have to start thinking if they have the right front wing philosophy. The reason why I am wondering is, the car has to be balanced on front and rear downforce, which is probably the case for NOW. Trying to simply enhance the rear downforce and not having a balanced amount of front downforce, would make the car more understeery. As it is, the Ferrari cars of the past 2 years and this one, have an inherent understeer. They already have higher AoA on their front wing, compared to Mercedes and any more, would create more drag and mess up flow downstream.
I have a feeling that, they probably have overestimated the downforce level that can be extracted from their rear wing. May be because of that, the rest of the rear of the car probably is producing less downforce than Mercedes.
The problem is, Ferrari haven't shown great deal of in-season development in the past seasons and if this in fact is something, then you don't put a lot of money on them coming out flying for the rest of the season.
To put it in context, previously no team had ever gone through a major reg change and kept their title. Mercedes have done once and are looking like pulling it off again!marvin78 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 13:41I must say: Kudos to Mercedes. They seem to have a hell of a car again. I am really surprised that they can hold this level of developement over so many years. It's a really big thing that is going on therre. It's a pitty that they always talk themelves down. They are by far the best at the whole package and everyone should know that by know. Absolutely impressive. Dominating such a long aera is new. And there seems to be no end for that.
I have said this in the past and say it again. It's the depth that this team has in their ranks and the culture that the management has cultivated in the organization. They have not created a team around an individual's ideas, but have allowed individuals to bring their ideas. Brawn left, then Bob Bell left then Paddy Lowe left and now Aldo Costa has retired (albeit he is consulting mode now). Essentially, this team is not dependent upon the executive management and have the strength to conceive newer ideas for the car, go ahead and build them. Most importantly, as Toto has been mentioning, "See it, say it, fix it" culture has allowed people to express themselves well. The secure atmosphere where there is no witch hunting on failures, allows them to come back stronger, every time there is a hiccup. The heroes are most likely people whose names we don't know.Restomaniac wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 13:58To put it in context, previously no team had ever gone through a major reg change and kept their title. Mercedes have done once and are looking like pulling it off again!marvin78 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 13:41I must say: Kudos to Mercedes. They seem to have a hell of a car again. I am really surprised that they can hold this level of developement over so many years. It's a really big thing that is going on therre. It's a pitty that they always talk themelves down. They are by far the best at the whole package and everyone should know that by know. Absolutely impressive. Dominating such a long aera is new. And there seems to be no end for that.
You mean the 2017 and 2019 aero changes respectively?Restomaniac wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 13:58To put it in context, previously no team had ever gone through a major reg change and kept their title. Mercedes have done once and are looking like pulling it off again!
Yet no team has ever managed it through similar reg changes no matter how major/minor.JordanMugen wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 14:49You mean the 2017 and 2019 aero changes respectively?Restomaniac wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 13:58To put it in context, previously no team had ever gone through a major reg change and kept their title. Mercedes have done once and are looking like pulling it off again!
While superficially major, 2017 were specifically designed as a rescaling of the existing 2016 cars AFAIK... even the relative proportions of the front and rear tyres were maintained at the same ratio.
The 2019 front wing change is quite minor, and most teams have similar overall concepts as before.
Agreed.GPR -A wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 14:25I have said this in the past and say it again. It's the depth that this team has in their ranks and the culture that the management has cultivated in the organization. They have not created a team around an individual's ideas, but have allowed individuals to bring their ideas. Brawn left, then Bob Bell left then Paddy Lowe left and now Aldo Costa has retired (albeit he is consulting mode now). Essentially, this team is not dependent upon the executive management and have the strength to conceive newer ideas for the car, go ahead and build them. Most importantly, as Toto has been mentioning, "See it, say it, fix it" culture has allowed people to express themselves well. The secure atmosphere where there is no witch hunting on failures, allows them to come back stronger, every time there is a hiccup. The heroes are most likely people whose names we don't know.Restomaniac wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 13:58To put it in context, previously no team had ever gone through a major reg change and kept their title. Mercedes have done once and are looking like pulling it off again!marvin78 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 13:41I must say: Kudos to Mercedes. They seem to have a hell of a car again. I am really surprised that they can hold this level of developement over so many years. It's a really big thing that is going on therre. It's a pitty that they always talk themelves down. They are by far the best at the whole package and everyone should know that by know. Absolutely impressive. Dominating such a long aera is new. And there seems to be no end for that.
How about Ferrari maintaining their championships from 2000 to 2001, despite the raised front wing height in 2001?Restomaniac wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 14:54Yet no team has ever managed it through similar reg changes no matter how major/minor.
Yeah, Ferrari might have a little more. Their outlab was quicker than merc I believe.dfegan358 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2019, 14:50Vettel team radio after qualifying “ we had it , we had it. “ then “we know why though”
Any ideas to what he is getting at? Seen somewhere else referring to poor outlap management by the pit wall.
I’m not convinced. Something could going we don’t know about it. Obviously a problem with the CE as Giovinazzi needed his replaced.
Would an older spec CE, like vettel and Leclerc had today affect PU performance?