I thought it was building into a close finish but that VSC ruined it, totally unnecessary as well, the car was behind a barrier well off the racing line
The race was a bit of an anticlimax after recent years
I do not understand how do they not get it. Ferrari knew Leclerc cannot win on pace, but if he got lucky with VSC or SC he could have. This is why he went long and it almost worked out for him. If the VSC was a bit earlier, he could have got a pitstop and lost only 9 seconds instead of 20. With SC it could have been even better. This is not uncommon, teams with drivers that had compromised qualifying often times gamble with SC. In Baku this is even more logical.Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:13The SKY mob are STILL talking about Leclerc pitting earlier onto the Softs.
What is wrong with these people
Fundamental flaw in the set up? How do you imagine such a flaw? The car is a diva, that’s the main thing. It needs to be learned and the team will have more clue every race. Just like the Mercedes especially in 2017.Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:15I’m starting to wonder if he has just accepted that their is a fundamental flaw in the current Ferrari set up.Bill_Kar wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:12This is just me, but I think his body language resembles the mental state he had towards the end of 2017 and 2018.Stahlkocher wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:06Imagine a season with a Mercedes 1-2 every race...
Mercedes might bring the update at Barcelona while Ferrari still got no clue what is wrong with their car.
Maybe RB will manage to fix their car at least.
If Racing Point continues like that they might have a real shot of 4th overall.
Sidenote: Vettel was way to happy in my opinion for a third place. Is he mentally already in a fight with Leclerc only and not Mercedes anymore?
Leclerc faster in Baku? Where did you get that fromLM10 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:58Fundamental flaw in the set up? How do you imagine such a flaw? The car is a diva, that’s the main thing. It needs to be learned and the team will have more clue every race. Just like the Mercedes especially in 2017.Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:15I’m starting to wonder if he has just accepted that their is a fundamental flaw in the current Ferrari set up.
This talk about a fundamental problem is quite funny. If Ferrari managed to be faster than Mercedes in Bahrain and kind of faster (Leclerc) in Baku as well with a car which is claimed to have fundamental problems, then Mercedes might pray Ferrari not to overcome those issues?
That’s not the bottom line, it’s just your opinion.
Seems you’ve not watched the sessions until yesterday? Leclerc was constantly 3 tenths faster than Vettel and he probably would have gotten pole. Or let’s say, he at least would have been as fast as Mercedes and I’m not sure that would be possible with a car with fundamental aero problems.Bill_Kar wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 17:03Leclerc faster in Baku? Where did you get that fromLM10 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:58Fundamental flaw in the set up? How do you imagine such a flaw? The car is a diva, that’s the main thing. It needs to be learned and the team will have more clue every race. Just like the Mercedes especially in 2017.Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:15
I’m starting to wonder if he has just accepted that their is a fundamental flaw in the current Ferrari set up.
This talk about a fundamental problem is quite funny. If Ferrari managed to be faster than Mercedes in Bahrain and kind of faster (Leclerc) in Baku as well with a car which is claimed to have fundamental problems, then Mercedes might pray Ferrari not to overcome those issues?
The upgrades were a part of what will come to Barcelona. There still are a few new parts in pipeline.Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:29But Ferrari have already thrown their double six (Barcelona) updates early. Mercedes will (I imagine) have theirs still to come for Barcelona.Shakeman wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:25Peter Windsor, again accurately IMO, said the Ferrari is an exceptionally fast car with a tiny operating window.Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:15
I’m starting to wonder if he has just accepted that their is a fundamental flaw in the current Ferrari set up.
The big problem is the car slides very quickly out of this window and it looks extremely ordinary. Ferrari must hope they can get on top of the setup and updates widen the operating window because Merc could do 1-2 all year at this rate.
That for me is the biggest worry.
A few. Mercedes have got them ALL to come.LM10 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 17:17The upgrades were a part of what will come to Barcelona. There still are a few new parts in pipeline.Restomaniac wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:29But Ferrari have already thrown their double six (Barcelona) updates early. Mercedes will (I imagine) have theirs still to come for Barcelona.Shakeman wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:25
Peter Windsor, again accurately IMO, said the Ferrari is an exceptionally fast car with a tiny operating window.
The big problem is the car slides very quickly out of this window and it looks extremely ordinary. Ferrari must hope they can get on top of the setup and updates widen the operating window because Merc could do 1-2 all year at this rate.
That for me is the biggest worry.
You are correct, the team not understanding it isn't a flaw. Having an incredibly narrow window is a flaw though. Not to mention in 2017 the Mercedes looked way better than it actually was, Vettel and Ferrari made sure of that with several issues towards the end of the season.
Yes, it was developing into a climax with only 1.5 secs at the top, with 10+ laps to go. It got ruined with an unnecessary vsc.Unc1eM0nty wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:53I thought it was building into a close finish but that VSC ruined it, totally unnecessary as well, the car was behind a barrier well off the racing line
The race was a bit of an anticlimax after recent years
What? Did you see that Mercedes was way ahead in race simulations? Free practice times mean nothing, especially when Vettel and Mercedes are holding back till Q3.LM10 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 17:12Seems you’ve not watched the sessions until yesterday? Leclerc was constantly 3 tenths faster than Vettel and he probably would have gotten pole. Or let’s say, he at least would have been as fast as Mercedes and I’m not sure that would be possible with a car with fundamental aero problems.Bill_Kar wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 17:03Leclerc faster in Baku? Where did you get that fromLM10 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2019, 16:58
Fundamental flaw in the set up? How do you imagine such a flaw? The car is a diva, that’s the main thing. It needs to be learned and the team will have more clue every race. Just like the Mercedes especially in 2017.
This talk about a fundamental problem is quite funny. If Ferrari managed to be faster than Mercedes in Bahrain and kind of faster (Leclerc) in Baku as well with a car which is claimed to have fundamental problems, then Mercedes might pray Ferrari not to overcome those issues?