strad wrote: ↑07 May 2020, 22:13
Not true Tim
I and many of my friends have made many such trips.
I spent a great deal of my life traveling between Seattle and Phoenix on a regular basis.
How about if I want to go hunting in Montana something else we do? That would still take 3 stops.
Or Yosemite 3 or 4 stops or New Orleans 2575 7 to 8 stops, another regular trip for me.
I have a good friend outside of Gallup N.M. 1300 miles. Is that unheard of by you Tim? It's not unheard of for me and my friends.
Maybe a day will come when it will financially make more sense for you to rent a vehicle for those use cases, and the savings of limiting the utility of your primary transport will make that scenario viable. For instance, not owning a truck and paying for its fuel and wear items on a daily basis means when it comes time to tow or move, or even bring home wood from the store, it feels like renting saved me money and allowed me to get exactly what I needed for the use I had. I can rent a truck to tow a boat, or a flatbed to move a machine, and I wasn't exposing myself to their maintence costs daily all for the utility to use it randomly. I am guessing as vehicles become more technologically closer to phones in terms of ability to repair the proposition of ownership vs sharing in a fleet program may make sense and it may be far more convenient.
I could turo a Van for a mountain biking/camping trip while daily driving an i3 and overall may be in a better value proposition. Now imagine GM/Ford/Chrysler etc.. have fleets of these vehicles waiting for you to check in and drive off.
But all that is mild fantasy, because daily my friends, peers, relatives, all buy vehicles for that one days use per month and I couldn't convince them otherwise. We love to have cake twice, we just don't remember paying for it twice.