That was, indeed, my point. The original contention (that a few years was enough for everyone to reach exactly the same development point) was ridiculous so I was placing it's ridiculousness into context.Sieper wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 14:19Not really, is is totally off topic talk that is trying to simplify to a ridiculous level plus it is fallacy, trying to make a point which is not there.
Mercedes has a top Level chassis maybe a bit aimed at one lap pace
RBR has a almost top chassis that is easier on tires
Williams has a bottom tier chassis.
That is true. I don't think Honda has the same ultimate grunt that Renault has. There is not a big margin, probably a tenth or max less than two tenths, purely on power. Renault's biggest problem was reliability, which was holding them back from unleashing full power. That is why their PUs were blowing up up until last year. This year so far, they seem to be holding up better and showing up decent performance.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 19:49Because their chassis is not as good as RBR’s (in the hands of Max to be more accurate)... It isn’t engine related.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
If it eats tyres faster, then it doesn't have a good race pace. Race pace is a compromise between speed and tyre life. An example is the Mercedes W04 (2013 car), which was rocket in qualifying and at the beginning of the race, but then it used to chew away tyres that caused them lose races where they got pole.
It is not just the work he does not do for Red Bull, but the work he does do for competitors.Moore77 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 20:41That is true. I don't think Honda has the same ultimate grunt that Renault has. There is not a big margin, probably a tenth or max less than two tenths, purely on power. Renault's biggest problem was reliability, which was holding them back from unleashing full power. That is why their PUs were blowing up up until last year. This year so far, they seem to be holding up better and showing up decent performance.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 19:49Because their chassis is not as good as RBR’s (in the hands of Max to be more accurate)... It isn’t engine related.Alexf1 wrote:
Then why are McLaren and Renault both a lap down?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Neither McLaren, nor Renault have as good a chassis as Red bull has, which is the big differentiating factor today. If McLaren spins up a chassis that could rival Red Bull, then Red Bull have their hands full to fight with McLaren, who are on a slow rise, but on a definite rise. With a Mercedes PU next year and with Ric onboard, they would be more than handful for sure. Honda sure have to continue to be aggressive and innovative to keep Red Bull at the front and Red Bull have a steep road to catch and beat that Mercedes.
Don't know how many people share my feeling, but I feel Red Bull erred in letting James Key go. He is a very capable designer, who brought good success to Force India, Sauber and Toro Rosso. He should have been brought to Red Bull, instead of letting him go to a rival. I have a strong belief, he is going to do a great job for McLaren.
Last comment was perhaps a bit too blunt for my liking. But on the other hand I don’t understand why RB didn’t take him in immediately. This guy is driving at 300+ km /hr on a strip of asphalt lined with barriers and is telling you that tires are gone. That seem hardly a position to question his judgement.Moore77 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 17:42I am not sure who else is appreciating the behavior of Max Verstappen, but sure I am. He did the right thing in Silverstone2 and once again here, teaching his team where to focus on. In the end, he spoke highly of the result achieved today, given the performance difference. Well played Max.
I think you saw what I mean.Moore77 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 20:46If it eats tyres faster, then it doesn't have a good race pace. Race pace is a compromise between speed and tyre life. An example is the Mercedes W04 (2013 car), which was rocket in qualifying and at the beginning of the race, but then it used to chew away tyres that caused them lose races where they got pole.
Are you seriously suggesting Mercedes started working on their engines years before the specifications were even decided?ispano6 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 14:19Probably because Suzie nor Valterri no longer were in Williams... The year Bottas and Massa drove Williams to p2 in the constructors championship was thanks to the engine and straight line speed. Mercedes had something like 7 years headstart on the hybrid tech I've read (that alone should be reason to clamp down on them). That Honda has surpassed the other two manufacturers and is mounting a challenge and threatens to almost always have all 4 cars in the top ten just goes to show their integrity and determination. It's a great time to be a RedBull Honda fan and looking forward to more wins.
Good point, they could have waited until he cleared the train so the real reason must indeed to get race day tire data for the possibility of a one stopper for Max. Hadn’t considered that. I thought it was mostly because he was stuck behind the RPs.Wynters wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 20:28The strategy they chose was not to wait a few more laps until he cleared the train, but to pit him directly into that train. The only reason to pit him that early (outside of deg no other car was suffering from) was to get access to his tyre data in time to make a calculated decision for Verstappen. Pitting him that early also made his remaining stints harder and meant that he would always lose out if there was a safety car. Plus, they put him on the much worse tyre. If they wanted to beat RP, then wait until you've cleared the train and try the Soft.
But, it's no slight on the team that his race was sacrificed to try and give Verstappen the best chance of the win. It's what he's there for and he's well paid to do it.
Mudflap, I know you are very well informed. They convinced Hamilton to make the step to Mercedes in 2012 already. I think they have showed him what they were building. Is it not a well known rumour Mercedes had a very big say in this new formula. I can understand from FIA even. They wanted Mercedes in the game. Mercedes and Ferrari are the 2 big names. With agreeing on that engine formula they got it. Mercedes is not building the largest team in F1 without some level of guarantee. They have spent billions. It is not “just” marketing budget for them. It is the viability of them as a premium car brand with racing heritage. Certainly to sell AMG (badged) cars. Which must be very profitable compared to the more normal specced cars. I don’t think it is such a big step to assume Mercedes started development of this engine as soon as they decided to reenter F1 as a works team.Mudflap wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 21:16Are you seriously suggesting Mercedes started working on their engines years before the specifications were even decided?ispano6 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 14:19Probably because Suzie nor Valterri no longer were in Williams... The year Bottas and Massa drove Williams to p2 in the constructors championship was thanks to the engine and straight line speed. Mercedes had something like 7 years headstart on the hybrid tech I've read (that alone should be reason to clamp down on them). That Honda has surpassed the other two manufacturers and is mounting a challenge and threatens to almost always have all 4 cars in the top ten just goes to show their integrity and determination. It's a great time to be a RedBull Honda fan and looking forward to more wins.
The team remembered 2016 when Max kept a much faster Kimi behind in this track. They were afraid of the same to happen with Max stuck behind the Force India’s.Edax wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 20:57Last comment was perhaps a bit too blunt for my liking. But on the other hand I don’t understand why RB didn’t take him in immediately. This guy is driving at 300+ km /hr on a strip of asphalt lined with barriers and is telling you that tires are gone. That seem hardly a position to question his judgement.Moore77 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 17:42I am not sure who else is appreciating the behavior of Max Verstappen, but sure I am. He did the right thing in Silverstone2 and once again here, teaching his team where to focus on. In the end, he spoke highly of the result achieved today, given the performance difference. Well played Max.
Anyway I like how he speaks up and shares responsibility. Much better than blindly following orders and blaming the team afterwards.
Mudflap wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 21:16Are you seriously suggesting Mercedes started working on their engines years before the specifications were even decided?ispano6 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 14:19Probably because Suzie nor Valterri no longer were in Williams... The year Bottas and Massa drove Williams to p2 in the constructors championship was thanks to the engine and straight line speed. Mercedes had something like 7 years headstart on the hybrid tech I've read (that alone should be reason to clamp down on them). That Honda has surpassed the other two manufacturers and is mounting a challenge and threatens to almost always have all 4 cars in the top ten just goes to show their integrity and determination. It's a great time to be a RedBull Honda fan and looking forward to more wins.
With the risk of going off-topic - let's just put things into perspective.Sieper wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 21:30Mudflap, I know you are very well informed. They convinced Hamilton to make the step to Mercedes in 2012 already. I think they have showed him what they were building. Is it not a well known rumour Mercedes had a very big say in this new formula. I can understand from FIA even. They wanted Mercedes in the game. Mercedes and Ferrari are the 2 big names. With agreeing on that engine formula they got it. Mercedes is not building the largest team in F1 without some level of guarantee. They have spent billions. It is not “just” marketing budget for them. It is the viability of them as a premium car brand with racing heritage. Certainly to sell AMG (badged) cars. Which must be very profitable compared to the more normal specced cars. I don’t think it is such a big step to assume Mercedes started development of this engine as soon as they decided to reenter F1 as a works team.Mudflap wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 21:16Are you seriously suggesting Mercedes started working on their engines years before the specifications were even decided?ispano6 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 14:19Probably because Suzie nor Valterri no longer were in Williams... The year Bottas and Massa drove Williams to p2 in the constructors championship was thanks to the engine and straight line speed. Mercedes had something like 7 years headstart on the hybrid tech I've read (that alone should be reason to clamp down on them). That Honda has surpassed the other two manufacturers and is mounting a challenge and threatens to almost always have all 4 cars in the top ten just goes to show their integrity and determination. It's a great time to be a RedBull Honda fan and looking forward to more wins.
But we have to ask yet again why none of the other teams did the same? There were no secrets, it was all sorted out in meetings with reps of everyone there (even those who never built the engines). Just as with today's race, Merc did a better job of it.Sieper wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 21:30Mudflap, I know you are very well informed. They convinced Hamilton to make the step to Mercedes in 2012 already. I think they have showed him what they were building. Is it not a well known rumour Mercedes had a very big say in this new formula. I can understand from FIA even. They wanted Mercedes in the game. Mercedes and Ferrari are the 2 big names. With agreeing on that engine formula they got it. Mercedes is not building the largest team in F1 without some level of guarantee. They have spent billions. It is not “just” marketing budget for them. It is the viability of them as a premium car brand with racing heritage. Certainly to sell AMG (badged) cars. Which must be very profitable compared to the more normal specced cars. I don’t think it is such a big step to assume Mercedes started development of this engine as soon as they decided to reenter F1 as a works team.Mudflap wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 21:16Are you seriously suggesting Mercedes started working on their engines years before the specifications were even decided?ispano6 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 14:19Probably because Suzie nor Valterri no longer were in Williams... The year Bottas and Massa drove Williams to p2 in the constructors championship was thanks to the engine and straight line speed. Mercedes had something like 7 years headstart on the hybrid tech I've read (that alone should be reason to clamp down on them). That Honda has surpassed the other two manufacturers and is mounting a challenge and threatens to almost always have all 4 cars in the top ten just goes to show their integrity and determination. It's a great time to be a RedBull Honda fan and looking forward to more wins.