Thank you! Im so sick of seeing this.Ringleheim wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 08:30It's ridiculous to suggest the two Ferraris are not the same car. Absolutely ridiculous.
It's more ridiculous to see the difference in results between drivers this year and to conclude, "Well, Vettel is just giving up and the car doesn't suit his style."Ringleheim wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 08:30It's ridiculous to suggest the two Ferraris are not the same car. Absolutely ridiculous.
It looks like a reasonable explanation to the difference we can see from race to race. I don't really think Vettel looses his speed just from a blink of an eye. Further developing a car to Leclerc's taste, it's a very good learning curve for both the team and Leclerc. Which brings two other questions into my head:JPBD1990 wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 08:51There is no doubt that this car was and is being honed based on Leclerc’s preferences. That’s 100% to be expected - look at Redbull.Ringleheim wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 08:30It's ridiculous to suggest the two Ferraris are not the same car. Absolutely ridiculous.
Seb is leaving at the end of the year which compounds this, as there’s no return on investment for Ferrari to bring the car back to Vettel’s style - when Charles is going from strength to strength.
All that’s happening here is that the balance between their two sets of priorities in terms of driving preferences is gone. Ferrari is developing for Leclerc, which is totally normal and to be expected. That ISN’T the same thing as the cars being different.
I have no doubt this fact is exasperating Vettel’s poor performance, but lest we forget that Charles already outscored him last year.
I believe Charles is just better able to drive around a cars weakness - to adjust, where as Seb needs what he needs to do well and isn’t getting it. That sucks for seb, but these conspiracies need to die.
For anyone working a large corporation this makes so much sense. I see it all too much.cheeRS wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 18:27It's more ridiculous to see the difference in results between drivers this year and to conclude, "Well, Vettel is just giving up and the car doesn't suit his style."Ringleheim wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 08:30It's ridiculous to suggest the two Ferraris are not the same car. Absolutely ridiculous.
I mean, the difference is basically the biggest between teammates on the grid. Even during the days that Riccardo beat Vettel, it wasn't like this.
People don't seem to understand what Ferrari is, what kind of team it is. If you cross Ferrari, you're done, plain and simple. Doesn't matter if you're Prost, Schumacher, or Vettel. If you talk bad about Ferrari (which Vettel continues to do), they have to support their reputation.
Ferrari have all the incentive in the world to make Vettel look bad. They're not in the fight this year, even if Vettel was doing as well as LeClerc, so "sabatoge" doesn't matter. If they make a 4 time WDC look like a bad rookie, it vindicates their car and their #1 driver and makes Ferrari look good for getting rid of "the problem", Vettel. Think about it. If Vettel was getting podiums, doing well in Q3, people would question Binotto's decision to sack him.
As last years car was designed to suit Vettel, in the end it was Leclerc being the more successful driver. It might very well be that Ferrari took into account the preferences of Leclerc while designing and later on adapting the draggy SF1000 to a more suitable racing car. It just shows Leclerc could adapt his driving style and still outperform Vettel in 2019, while the other way around Vettel has no chance to do the same this year.Gothrek wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 21:49For anyone working a large corporation this makes so much sense. I see it all too much.cheeRS wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 18:27It's more ridiculous to see the difference in results between drivers this year and to conclude, "Well, Vettel is just giving up and the car doesn't suit his style."Ringleheim wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 08:30It's ridiculous to suggest the two Ferraris are not the same car. Absolutely ridiculous.
I mean, the difference is basically the biggest between teammates on the grid. Even during the days that Riccardo beat Vettel, it wasn't like this.
People don't seem to understand what Ferrari is, what kind of team it is. If you cross Ferrari, you're done, plain and simple. Doesn't matter if you're Prost, Schumacher, or Vettel. If you talk bad about Ferrari (which Vettel continues to do), they have to support their reputation.
Ferrari have all the incentive in the world to make Vettel look bad. They're not in the fight this year, even if Vettel was doing as well as LeClerc, so "sabatoge" doesn't matter. If they make a 4 time WDC look like a bad rookie, it vindicates their car and their #1 driver and makes Ferrari look good for getting rid of "the problem", Vettel. Think about it. If Vettel was getting podiums, doing well in Q3, people would question Binotto's decision to sack him.
Last year's car was a dragster and poor in the corners. It had a loose rear end. Which part of that car was designed to suit Vettel?hape wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 23:06As last years car was designed to suit Vettel, in the end it was Leclerc being the more successful driver. It might very well be that Ferrari took into account the preferences of Leclerc while designing and later on adapting the draggy SF1000 to a more suitable racing car. It just shows Leclerc could adapt his driving style and still outperform Vettel in 2019, while the other way around Vettel has no chance to do the same this year.Gothrek wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 21:49For anyone working a large corporation this makes so much sense. I see it all too much.cheeRS wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 18:27
It's more ridiculous to see the difference in results between drivers this year and to conclude, "Well, Vettel is just giving up and the car doesn't suit his style."
I mean, the difference is basically the biggest between teammates on the grid. Even during the days that Riccardo beat Vettel, it wasn't like this.
People don't seem to understand what Ferrari is, what kind of team it is. If you cross Ferrari, you're done, plain and simple. Doesn't matter if you're Prost, Schumacher, or Vettel. If you talk bad about Ferrari (which Vettel continues to do), they have to support their reputation.
Ferrari have all the incentive in the world to make Vettel look bad. They're not in the fight this year, even if Vettel was doing as well as LeClerc, so "sabatoge" doesn't matter. If they make a 4 time WDC look like a bad rookie, it vindicates their car and their #1 driver and makes Ferrari look good for getting rid of "the problem", Vettel. Think about it. If Vettel was getting podiums, doing well in Q3, people would question Binotto's decision to sack him.
Let’s wait and see what happens next year for SV. No excuses against Stroll.
I think all the cars are designed to suit Ferrari engineers, and last years car started off suiting Vettel, and grew into LeClerc, and moved closer this year.LM10 wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 23:34Last year's car was a dragster and poor in the corners. It had a loose rear end. Which part of that car was designed to suit Vettel?hape wrote: ↑26 Oct 2020, 23:06As last years car was designed to suit Vettel, in the end it was Leclerc being the more successful driver. It might very well be that Ferrari took into account the preferences of Leclerc while designing and later on adapting the draggy SF1000 to a more suitable racing car. It just shows Leclerc could adapt his driving style and still outperform Vettel in 2019, while the other way around Vettel has no chance to do the same this year.
Let’s wait and see what happens next year for SV. No excuses against Stroll.
Leclerc is a special talent. He not only is fast, but he obviously manages to adapt and drive around the issues and weaknesses of the car. I don't think there is any driver who will like a loose rear end, but there are drivers who get affected way less by that than other drivers.
It would be really interesting to see the average time gap in qualifying this season actually. In my head, it's something crazy like 0.5 seconds but that could just be my brain remembering a few big outliers and assuming it to be normal.e30ernest wrote: ↑27 Oct 2020, 04:15I haven't been paying attention to the lap time differences lately, but I think they aren't that far off from each other (Vet and Lec)? Things might just look worse than it is due to how tightly packed the midfield is. A few tenths or even a few hundredths can see you slip down a few places easily.