They were most effected by simplification rules of fw but now they look they overcame it.
Interesting. Doesn't a spoon wing reduce tip vortices, yet the 2022 rules wish to maximise the tip vortices (or counter rotating vortex pair) to maximise the uplift of the car wake away from the following car?godlameroso wrote: ↑05 Jul 2021, 18:02Next year's rear wing is a regulation mandated spoon wing, looks like Red Bull is smart developing a rear spoon wing, it will give them insights for next year.
If all you had was a spoon wing vs a barn door, sure. However there is more than just a wing back there. There's a diffuser, and end plates, and an exhaust, and suspension members, and all of those things work together as one.JordanMugen wrote: ↑05 Jul 2021, 18:15Interesting. Doesn't a spoon wing reduce tip vortices, yet the 2022 rules wish to maximise the tip vortices (or counter rotating vortex pair) to maximise the uplift of the car wake away from the following car?godlameroso wrote: ↑05 Jul 2021, 18:02Next year's rear wing is a regulation mandated spoon wing, looks like Red Bull is smart developing a rear spoon wing, it will give them insights for next year.
Seems contradictory.
The regulations won't improve racing, vortices are clean and efficient airflow. Turbulence is not, turbulence is what the car's wake generates. You can't stop that from happening. If the 2022 tunnels created nice stable vortices instead of that turbulent mess we have now, then we could get good racing.JordanMugen wrote: ↑05 Jul 2021, 18:15Interesting. Doesn't a spoon wing reduce tip vortices, yet the 2022 rules wish to maximise the tip vortices (or counter rotating vortex pair) to maximise the uplift of the car wake away from the following car?godlameroso wrote: ↑05 Jul 2021, 18:02Next year's rear wing is a regulation mandated spoon wing, looks like Red Bull is smart developing a rear spoon wing, it will give them insights for next year.
Seems contradictory.
Did they forgot to tell RB about the budget cap or what lolMorteza wrote: ↑06 Jul 2021, 12:00https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5mcRM1XMAI ... ame=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5mcRLfXwAA ... ame=medium
Via @NicolasF1i
if you think correctly they have practically 2 budgets.....DarthPlagueisTheVise wrote: ↑06 Jul 2021, 19:22Did they forgot to tell RB about the budget cap or what lolMorteza wrote: ↑06 Jul 2021, 12:00https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5mcRM1XMAI ... ame=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5mcRLfXwAA ... ame=medium
Via @NicolasF1i
I don't know what material they are using for making moulds but very small change at front wing mean building a new mould. Some changes affect other parts too so making more mold and making them precise, I think it costs very much.
By this logic every team should keep on upgrading their cars like RedBull instead of focusing on 2022 entirely.
Every team makes their choices. Not so much due to the current cost cap, but due to the engineers they currently have working. RedBULL f.e. This year Does a lot of adapting parts, reworking parts, repairing parts and just have enough available for one car first. In other years they often had the new parts for two cars at the same time and had more spare parts.
The thing is that teams have limited tunnel and simulation times - the better placed last year, the less time. It’s not only about the pure costs of manufacturing parts. Using some of the simulation time for this year’s upgrades makes you lose that time for next year’s car, obviously.Sieper wrote: ↑10 Jul 2021, 18:33Every team makes their choices. Not so much due to the current cost cap, but due to the engineers they currently have working. RedBULL f.e. This year Does a lot of adapting parts, reworking parts, repairing parts and just have enough available for one car first. In other years they often had the new parts for two cars at the same time and had more spare parts.
In that way you can upgrade but still keep capacity to work on 2022 parts. Other top teams could do the same. Smaller teams don’t have that engineer capacity and redbull has always been working like this. It is core to their way of working. Mercedes and Ferrari do that differently.
So no, not every team can do this.
Every part you make requires materials both for the part itself and for molds required. And there is wastage of materials e.g. off cuts that can't be used elsewhere. If those parts are additional to the ones you budgeted for then the material has to be bought. Any time spent making those parts can't be used to make other parts - a technician can only do one thing at a time. So there is materials budget and manpower budget. To say that making parts doesn't cost budget is strange, I must say.