Not arguing with you at all, but in what you are saying, max should have yielded when they entered luffield as he was slightly behind and on the inside. It's a really difficult call no matter what side you take.
That's not what the rules say. I can't remember the specific rule off the top of my head but if any part of your car is alongside you are entitled to space. so if your front Wing is a long his back tire you're entitled to space
so basically like leclerc and perez last race?? perez shut the door on divebomb leclerc pass attempt on turn 6 and look who got off with the penalty....101FlyingDutchman wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021, 16:28You can see on the sky pad that VER gave HAM room by reducing the steering angle. He absolutely gave HAM space as he knew he was there. Except HAM did nothing with the extra space and kept it tight with VER. To me it’s deliberately placing a car in a place on track to cause a collision.
Very sensible assessment… Fully agree with youHoffman900 wrote:My last post on this because the lack of real racing experience and bias on here is appalling. That move alone will get you some sort of penalty in most race series.
Max put himself into that situation. By most rules, when he made the move right, he is suppose to stay there or creep back left. Instead he pushes Lewis right, swings left, and then dives into the apex.
With them both having a hand in it, it’s a racing incident.
Lewis also has some blame, it’s a high risk pass, Max has shown before to be aggressive (see Imola this year) , and it’s an aero dependent corner which being the following car is always going to make grip questionable.
If George Russell gets 3 place grid drop for doing something similar to Sainz yesterday, then that must be a 10 second stop-go atleast, otherwise then don't give penalties at all just allow the drivers to crash. Amazing Chandhok is blaming Verstappen for giving Hamilton a car's width on the apex and then understeering into him by saying he didn't give him enough space. Missed the apex completely.