Moaning about someone using your data is one thing, trying to corrupt that data by underdelivering is a whole thing all together. Formula one is a team sport. Sometimes with two strikers and sometimes with one. If you can’t pass the ball to let your teammate score, you’re not a good footballer. Same goes for drivers. If this is true, no wonder no team is interested in giving him a seat.Wass85 wrote: ↑11 Apr 2020, 22:33The question is did Alonso ever use Hamilton's setups or was it just one way traffic?
If it is the latter than it's to be expected he was miffed with the team, Lewis moaned just as much when Rosberg was doing the same.
On the recent podcast Pedro de la Rosa basically confirms this and mentioned Alonso was purposely driving slow in practice to throw Hamilton off scent.
This brings up another interesting point, would Hamilton have been as great as he was making his debut against a journeyman of the sport?
Ron Dennis learned from PM never hold a grudge when an opportunity comes around. His McLaren of 2015 was modelled after the old McLaren-PM days, with two top drivers, Honda of course and bold predictions. In 2007, not only Daimler was McLarens biggest shareholder with an option to take over total control, Stuttgart personel was also controlling the board. Alonso was a Mercedes employee, even more he was paid by Honda in 2015-2017. Daimler by the way does hold a grudge (as does Honda)kimetic wrote: ↑11 Apr 2020, 23:25Hamilton always had respect for Alonso and said so, that was the basis for their rapprochement later. And vice-versa. It's all so intense these days, they all have their moments, but Alonso did alienate the team, siding with Mosley, and that never works. Though they took him back in the end, says a lot.
Hamilton's first test with McLaren. de la Rosa was reasonably quicker in the first session. Talked to the engineers. Yeah, Lewis is ok but he's got a lot to learn blah, blah.
Let's not try and pretend though that Alonso failed to reach the podium due to a lack of pace.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Apr 2020, 01:35Hamilton's first test with McLaren. de la Rosa was reasonably quicker in the first session. Talked to the engineers. Yeah, Lewis is ok but he's got a lot to learn blah, blah.
Second session, de la Rosa came back in to the find that Hamilton was much quicker than him. He was monstering through Becketts etc. At that point, de la Rosa said that he knew that Hamilton was something special.
Hamilton is one of those drivers that can drive around a car's issues. Button has said this in interviews about their time together. He liked a car to be in his sweet spot in order to be quick. Hamilton would go out and still be quick anyway. Give him a car in the sweet spot and he goes even quicker.
That's from drivers who worked with him.
Another thought. If Alonso's data was so crucial to Hamilton, it's interesting that Hamilton was on the podium for the first 9 races of 2007. Alonso missed the podium 3 times in those first 9 races. Hamilton took 6 poles in 2007 to Alonso's 2.
Fernando kept getting it wrong on braking, like going off, while Lewis was great at applying a huge initial load while there was lots of downforce and then easing it off. I think Brembo or whoever it was was new to Fernando as well, also he is a bit smaller so perhaps he was nearer his maximum effort which is harder to modulateJust_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Apr 2020, 01:35Another thought. If Alonso's data was so crucial to Hamilton, it's interesting that Hamilton was on the podium for the first 9 races of 2007. Alonso missed the podium 3 times in those first 9 races. Hamilton took 6 poles in 2007 to Alonso's 2.
izzy wrote: ↑12 Apr 2020, 08:51Fernando kept getting it wrong on braking, like going off, while Lewis was great at applying a huge initial load while there was lots of downforce and then easing it off. I think Brembo or whoever it was was new to Fernando as well, also he is a bit smaller so perhaps he was nearer his maximum effort which is harder to modulateJust_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Apr 2020, 01:35Another thought. If Alonso's data was so crucial to Hamilton, it's interesting that Hamilton was on the podium for the first 9 races of 2007. Alonso missed the podium 3 times in those first 9 races. Hamilton took 6 poles in 2007 to Alonso's 2.
And yes Lewis has incredible car control, on old tyres he's like nobody else, it's why they left him out in China ...
Yes Ron, one of the greats, it's a disgrace he hasn't had a knighthood like Frank. He was so right about re-hiring Alonso, so wrong about Honda at the time. But F1 had moved beyond his style by then, they needed more than an engine.Jolle wrote: ↑11 Apr 2020, 23:41Ron Dennis learned from PM never hold a grudge when an opportunity comes around. His McLaren of 2015 was modelled after the old McLaren-PM days, with two top drivers, Honda of course and bold predictions. In 2007, not only Daimler was McLarens biggest shareholder with an option to take over total control, Stuttgart personel was also controlling the board. Alonso was a Mercedes employee, even more he was paid by Honda in 2015-2017. Daimler by the way does hold a grudge (as does Honda)kimetic wrote: ↑11 Apr 2020, 23:25Hamilton always had respect for Alonso and said so, that was the basis for their rapprochement later. And vice-versa. It's all so intense these days, they all have their moments, but Alonso did alienate the team, siding with Mosley, and that never works. Though they took him back in the end, says a lot.
So, he wasn't that great then? If he cracked under the pressure, had a bad season, then he's not "great", right?
It definitely needs to be considered when he's in the discussion for the best driver of all time.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Apr 2020, 10:45So, he wasn't that great then? If he cracked under the pressure, had a bad season, then he's not "great", right?
Don't forget, Hamilton was in his first season in F1 and sharing the garage with the current double world champion. Who he beat over the course of the season. How many excuses does Alonso get in order to show that Hamilton wasn't that good after all?