Agreed, the same can be said of Bottas' Q2 lap.Juzh wrote:Looking at massa's pole lap this williams probably had 0.3s in hand. Locking up, missing apexes in at least 3 corners.
Praying to god* for the crew to sleep well tonight...joseff wrote:Hopefully, this qualifying performance inspires the pit crew to not #%$@ up tomorrow.Juzh wrote:Looking at massa's pole lap this williams probably had 0.3s in hand. Locking up, missing apexes in at least 3 corners.
Signs of competition? Nothing against Williams as they did a good job. But mistakes were the order of the day. One who committed less mistakes took the pole. When Lewis made the mistake, he was already 3 tenth up by sector 2.GrizzleBoy wrote:Wow Paddy Lowe sounds totally shaken up.
Signs of competition causing cracks?
Code: Select all
6 N. ROSBERG
NO TIME NO TIME
1 14:11:37
2 1:21.114
3 1:11.279
4 1:27.025
5 1:10.835
6 1:28.700
7 1:18.613
8 1:17.048
9 1:17.924
10 1:10.730
11 1:10.499
12 P 1:18.248
13 10:28.066
14 1:10.399
15 1:24.362
16 1:30.513
17 1:10.525
18 1:20.909
19 1:22.222
20 1:09.919
21 P 1:24.408
22 8:42.364
23 1:14.138
24 1:14.690
25 1:13.792
26 1:13.308
27 1:13.920
28 1:14.283
29 1:14.751
30 P 1:20.262
31 1:37.530
32 1:13.937
33 1:13.813
34 1:13.754
35 1:15.531
36 1:14.563
37 1:20.388
38 1:13.853
39 1:13.980
40 P 1:20.440
41 P 1:34.821
42 P 1:50.237
43 1:35.841
44 1:13.725
45 1:13.871
46 1:18.215
47 1:15.705
48 1:14.346
49 1:14.832
50 P 1:19.428
44 L. HAMILTON
NO TIME NO TIME
1 14:12:28
2 1:15.872
3 1:12.565
4 1:18.650
5 1:10.841
6 1:10.525
7 1:20.906
8 1:10.460
9 1:23.727
10 P 1:20.654
11 12:59.977
12 1:09.652
13 1:23.692
14 1:33.532
15 1:09.542
16 P 1:25.773
17 P 10:07.847
18 2:01.824
19 1:15.083
20 1:14.346
21 1:14.185
22 1:13.829
23 1:20.483
24 1:13.586
25 1:14.203
26 1:13.739
27 1:17.471
28 1:13.688
29 P 1:17.661
30 1:32.343
31 1:13.591
32 1:13.795
33 1:13.105
34 1:13.924
35 1:13.492
36 1:17.856
37 P 1:23.302
19 F. MASSA
NO TIME NO TIME
1 14:13:58
2 1:11.729
3 1:11.140
4 1:18.737
5 1:16.158
6 1:11.049
7 P 1:22.952
8 P 1:53.155
9 14:30.664
10 1:10.521
11 1:27.039
12 1:16.638
13 P 1:18.907
14 P 1:47.565
15 P 13:16.448
16 1:52.615
17 1:15.145
18 1:14.443
19 1:14.484
20 1:15.212
21 1:15.136
22 1:14.756
23 1:14.852
24 1:15.249
25 1:15.223
26 1:18.357
27 1:14.115
28 1:14.803
29 1:16.907
30 1:14.959
31 1:15.366
32 1:15.566
33 1:15.978
34 P 1:20.060
35 1:32.542
36 1:14.052
37 1:14.431
38 1:13.967
39 P 1:17.173
77 V. BOTTAS
NO TIME NO TIME
1 14:14:28
2 1:13.384
3 1:17.071
4 1:11.213
5 1:16.281
6 1:10.790
7 P 1:17.042
8 P 1:34.521
9 14:47.225
10 1:19.403
11 1:16.733
12 1:10.519
13 1:14.190
14 1:10.995
15 1:10.844
16 P 1:16.889
17 P 1:37.420
18 P 7:58.341
19 1:40.148
20 1:15.275
21 1:14.853
22 1:14.316
23 1:16.229
24 1:15.636
25 1:14.478
26 1:14.687
27 1:15.267
28 1:15.327
29 1:15.521
30 1:14.936
31 1:14.833
32 1:14.581
33 1:14.367
34 1:15.287
35 1:14.739
36 1:14.765
37 1:15.189
38 1:15.171
39 1:15.131
40 1:14.937
41 1:15.138
42 1:15.953
43 P 1:20.759
44 P 1:39.361
At least he had the revenge on Rosberg by destroying his pole lapRZS10 wrote:A normal rear lockup isn't so 'snappy' looked like something was wrong, but as mentioned by others, Hamilton failed to nail his banker third time in a row -.-
I expect Button and Vettel on Softs. Both have no topspeed to overtake...as overtaking is hard, both will have to do something else with their strategy.mclaren_mircea wrote:What are the chanches of Jenson starting on softs NOT super softs from P11? I can't imagine him starting on the super softs given Mclaren's behaviour on the super softs. As P11 he can chose the tyres, so what do you think, will he chose the softs?
Please help me with this. Thanks.
Still a second slower...prince wrote:Signs of competition? Nothing against Williams as they did a good job. But mistakes were the order of the day. One who committed less mistakes took the pole. When Lewis made the mistake, he was already 3 tenth up by sector 2.GrizzleBoy wrote:Wow Paddy Lowe sounds totally shaken up.
Signs of competition causing cracks?
Here is the long run times from Friday FP2. Williams were the only ones who were closer to Merc, but how much?