FSAE Design -- help needed please

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
BreezyRacer
BreezyRacer
2
Joined: 04 Nov 2006, 00:31

Post

AeroGT3 wrote:I know a team that achieved similar numbers for a fact with their tray. It's possible. It's just hard to do.
Aero
Do you know what ride heights they were basing this on? While we're at it was it pitched? Inquiring minds want to know ..

BreezyRacer
BreezyRacer
2
Joined: 04 Nov 2006, 00:31

Post

miqi23 wrote:Breezy, is that more than your design?
So far, yes it is by a bit, but keep in mind we're limited by some rules that FSAE doesn't have. Plus, we're not done :lol:

Also our results will be more than just numbers in a spreadsheet. 40 mph is a pretty weird velocity to test at don't you think? It's not a normal test velocity and I wonder if these weren't some targets rather than results.

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Post

miqi23 wrote:Didnt get you mate, what you mean?
sorry poor spelling on my part

any number you put there gets published i could put 2000 lbs @ 0 mph and it would be published

AeroGT3
AeroGT3
0
Joined: 29 Mar 2006, 23:22

Post

BreezyRacer wrote:
AeroGT3 wrote:I know a team that achieved similar numbers for a fact with their tray. It's possible. It's just hard to do.
Aero
Do you know what ride heights they were basing this on? While we're at it was it pitched? Inquiring minds want to know ..
I don't know about ride heights in terms of standard measures, but their tray was less than 2" off the ground. It wasn't my team, but I know they broke their tray in the wind tunnel ;)

40 MPH is a common target speed (it's what our team uses as well) because FSAE cars run at much lower speeds. 30-40 MPH is a typical autocross cornering speed.

BreezyRacer
BreezyRacer
2
Joined: 04 Nov 2006, 00:31

Post

[quote="AeroGT3"]I don't know about ride heights in terms of standard measures, but their tray was less than 2" off the ground. It wasn't my team, but I know they broke their tray in the wind tunnel ;)

Yeh, I 've seen some pretty flimsey trays. I understand that everyone wants to use honeycomb cores 'cause they are trick but without excellent fab capabilities and great moulds it just ain't gonna turn out well. I'm usin finnish plywood for a core. The weight is not at all significant, especially considering when you slam pylons, etc.

AeroGT3
AeroGT3
0
Joined: 29 Mar 2006, 23:22

Post

BreezyRacer wrote:
AeroGT3 wrote:I don't know about ride heights in terms of standard measures, but their tray was less than 2" off the ground. It wasn't my team, but I know they broke their tray in the wind tunnel ;)

Yeh, I 've seen some pretty flimsey trays. I understand that everyone wants to use honeycomb cores 'cause they are trick but without excellent fab capabilities and great moulds it just ain't gonna turn out well. I'm usin finnish plywood for a core. The weight is not at all significant, especially considering when you slam pylons, etc.
I fully agree. My favrorite is the use of super cool aluminum honeycomb. Then when the tray is mounted it de-lams almost instantly! :lol:

We use a foam core on our tray, and will move to honeycomb when we get the proper nomex in from our supplier. We've used wood core for endplate composite panels before though, and I agree that simple is better!

BreezyRacer
BreezyRacer
2
Joined: 04 Nov 2006, 00:31

Post

When you say you know one team that pulled those numbers, you must be referring to the Missuori team? Are you sure those numbers aren't for the full aero package.? I just don't see it.

Just to put the numbers into perspective, that would equate to 200 lbs at 70 mph and almost 400 lbs at 100 mph, plus or minus. That's amazing for a tray that's only 5 or so foot long.

Please don't misunderstand .. I'm not disagreeing with you per se, and it sounds like you've been around a bit .. what kind of numbers were you able to pull with just the floor of your school's design? I know you're pretty happy with those results. How close to these numbers are they?

AeroGT3
AeroGT3
0
Joined: 29 Mar 2006, 23:22

Post

BreezyRacer wrote:When you say you know one team that pulled those numbers, you must be referring to the Missuori team? Are you sure those numbers aren't for the full aero package.? I just don't see it.
It's UTA. UMR only runs wings IIRC.
Just to put the numbers into perspective, that would equate to 200 lbs at 70 mph and almost 400 lbs at 100 mph, plus or minus. That's amazing for a tray that's only 5 or so foot long.
Those are low numbers as far as trays go. What's a 5 by 2 foot tray make if it lower the pressure by 0.1 Psi? 144 lbs.
Please don't misunderstand .. I'm not disagreeing with you per se, and it sounds like you've been around a bit .. what kind of numbers were you able to pull with just the floor of your school's design? I know you're pretty happy with those results. How close to these numbers are they?
Our design is not yet finished, but a preliminary test piece did 65 lbs @ 40 MPH. And believe me, it was definitely a "test" piece used to gather data more than produce DF.

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Post

AeroGT3 wrote:
BreezyRacer wrote:When you say you know one team that pulled those numbers, you must be referring to the Missuori team? Are you sure those numbers aren't for the full aero package.? I just don't see it.
It's UTA. UMR only runs wings IIRC.
Just to put the numbers into perspective, that would equate to 200 lbs at 70 mph and almost 400 lbs at 100 mph, plus or minus. That's amazing for a tray that's only 5 or so foot long.
Those are low numbers as far as trays go. What's a 5 by 2 foot tray make if it lower the pressure by 0.1 Psi? 144 lbs.
Please don't misunderstand .. I'm not disagreeing with you per se, and it sounds like you've been around a bit .. what kind of numbers were you able to pull with just the floor of your school's design? I know you're pretty happy with those results. How close to these numbers are they?
Our design is not yet finished, but a preliminary test piece did 65 lbs @ 40 MPH. And believe me, it was definitely a "test" piece used to gather data more than produce DF.
UMR runs a tray as well

any teams going to make it to mid west runoffs

AeroGT3
AeroGT3
0
Joined: 29 Mar 2006, 23:22

Post

flynfrog wrote:UMR runs a tray as well

any teams going to make it to mid west runoffs
We should be there :) Don't know if I will though haha.

BreezyRacer
BreezyRacer
2
Joined: 04 Nov 2006, 00:31

Post

AeroGT3 wrote:We should be there :) Don't know if I will though haha.
I hope you'll be in the UK! BTW guys I have just a couple of pics of the UMR undertray setup. If interested PM me. It's not really magic.

BreezyRacer
BreezyRacer
2
Joined: 04 Nov 2006, 00:31

Post

AeroGT3 wrote:
Just to put the numbers into perspective, that would equate to 200 lbs at 70 mph and almost 400 lbs at 100 mph, plus or minus. That's amazing for a tray that's only 5 or so foot long.
Those are low numbers as far as trays go. What's a 5 by 2 foot tray make if it lower the pressure by 0.1 Psi? 144 lbs.
That statement makes it sound like any 5 year old can do this. Let's not take for granted the work it would take to get that tenth PSi reduction. Tant easy ..

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Post

BreezyRacer wrote:
AeroGT3 wrote:We should be there :) Don't know if I will though haha.
I hope you'll be in the UK! BTW guys I have just a couple of pics of the UMR undertray setup. If interested PM me. It's not really magic.
i have a few too

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Post

another small pice of advice make a quick dirty set of wings and throw on the car

Image

note the excessive amount of glue

just to demonstrate how big of a difference it can make

we had a front one as well held on with some duct tape the results were rather eye catching


the newer set of wings is a big step forward form this one so im expecting good results

the tray is waiting for it to stop snowing for further testing

miqi23
miqi23
7
Joined: 11 Feb 2006, 02:31
Location: United Kingdom

Post

You got to be kidding mate :shock: What about the gills on the endplates to reduce turbulence if you are using a wing that big anyway? How about wing twist etc, they do work bigtime...