xpensive wrote:Quite obviously, opportunities to get things made swift and certain in Italy is vastly overshadowing Germany in this respect?wunderkind wrote: ...
Thirdly, it is only economical to make things in Germany if you are taking about huge volumes. For anything bespoke or low volume, the UK is the place to do it.
In the list of adjectives used to describe German industry, 'romantic' is an unexpected find.wunderkind wrote:Your idea of Mercedes moving all it's F1 operations back to Germany is a fanciful one that has been dismissed time and time again. It's a romantic notion, but that's it.
I was merely trying to describe Seijakessen's idea of a true Mercedes GP team should be based in Germany run by Germans.Pup wrote:In the list of adjectives used to describe German industry, 'romantic' is an unexpected find.wunderkind wrote:Your idea of Mercedes moving all it's F1 operations back to Germany is a fanciful one that has been dismissed time and time again. It's a romantic notion, but that's it.
Hahahaha that is all just so wrong.wunderkind wrote: Firstly, the pool of top notch F1 design and engineering expertise and experience in Germany is small. That means Mercedes will have to either start from scratch or hiring expats from all over Europe to live and work in Germany at great expense. Also, taxes are lower in the UK. The German language is also an issue. Like it or not, being in Germany means german will be the default language. But the F1 rules are written in English and having designers and engineers with English as their first language is an advantage.
Secondly, there is a small but very competent band of external parts and technology suppliers in the UK that do not exist in Germany. That means Mercedes will have to do even more things in-house to replicate the services provided by these external suppliers.
Thirdly, it is only economical to make things in Germany if you are taking about huge volumes. For anything bespoke or low volume, the UK is the place to do it.
That one-liner alone is worth a vote, while I couldn't care less if I lose three in the process, "Dix points" Pup!Pup wrote: ....
In the list of adjectives used to describe German industry, 'romantic' is an unexpected find.
Actually, were I Ron, I would have entered into the deal with Lamborghini for their V12 engines.wunderkind wrote:Just think rationally and look at the engine supplier landscape that year and most would probably have reached the same conclusion as Ron did.xpensive wrote:Why I guess that Ron the Con just went along with Peugeot and Chrysler because he was both gulleable and good-hearted?
Ron could not afford to stick with Peugeot because he was desperate for wins and the Peugeot engine seemed unable to deliver. Of course, the McLaren cars were also to blame. Mercedes was definitely the preferred engine supplier given it's resources, prestige, and will to win.
During my short time in Germany, most of the people I met spoke better English than me.mep wrote: Germans are actually able to learn English and to understand the rules It is rather a question if English people are able to learn German.
Well that's part of it, minus the run by Germans part.wunderkind wrote:I was merely trying to describe Seijakessen's idea of a true Mercedes GP team should be based in Germany run by Germans.Pup wrote:In the list of adjectives used to describe German industry, 'romantic' is an unexpected find.wunderkind wrote:Your idea of Mercedes moving all it's F1 operations back to Germany is a fanciful one that has been dismissed time and time again. It's a romantic notion, but that's it.
Wow, are we talking about high tech manufacturing or making t-shirts and running shoes?mep wrote:Hahahaha that is all just so wrong.wunderkind wrote: Firstly, the pool of top notch F1 design and engineering expertise and experience in Germany is small. That means Mercedes will have to either start from scratch or hiring expats from all over Europe to live and work in Germany at great expense. Also, taxes are lower in the UK. The German language is also an issue. Like it or not, being in Germany means german will be the default language. But the F1 rules are written in English and having designers and engineers with English as their first language is an advantage.
Secondly, there is a small but very competent band of external parts and technology suppliers in the UK that do not exist in Germany. That means Mercedes will have to do even more things in-house to replicate the services provided by these external suppliers.
Thirdly, it is only economical to make things in Germany if you are taking about huge volumes. For anything bespoke or low volume, the UK is the place to do it.
If you want to do something in high volume you better go to China. Everybody knows that.
Apart from that is engineering regarded so much higher in Germany than it is in the UK. Germany is actually great in low volume, specialised machinery, high class engineering and development. It is rather funny that UK still tries to do research and development with all their health and safety restrictions.
F1 teams are only located in the UK because their history originates there, meaning they were founded there. I guess motorsport is just of less interest for Germans which might be because it is hard to make money with it. However Sauber for example shows that it is possible to run a F1 team outside of UK. And btw. Germans are actually able to learn English and to understand the rules It is rather a question if English people are able to learn German.
Danke. If you're looking for an anniversary getaway for the misses, I can't recommend the Ruhr strongly enough.xpensive wrote:"Dix points" Pup!
Lamborghini had NO money to develop what was a heavy and unreliable engine at that time. That was the fact Ron was facing. Senna had a foot out the door anyway. The Williams-Renault combo was just superior.SeijaKessen wrote:Actually, were I Ron, I would have entered into the deal with Lamborghini for their V12 engines.wunderkind wrote:Just think rationally and look at the engine supplier landscape that year and most would probably have reached the same conclusion as Ron did.xpensive wrote:Why I guess that Ron the Con just went along with Peugeot and Chrysler because he was both gulleable and good-hearted?
Ron could not afford to stick with Peugeot because he was desperate for wins and the Peugeot engine seemed unable to deliver. Of course, the McLaren cars were also to blame. Mercedes was definitely the preferred engine supplier given it's resources, prestige, and will to win.
Why?
Either way he was going to be rolling the dice with a new engine supplier for 1994. But going with Lamborghini likely would have allowed him to retain Ayrton Senna. That would have been the difference maker...besides, they would have had plenty of time to work on the engine to get it up to reliability.
I've got a question regarding that last line though where you mention how Mercedes had prestige and the will to win.
Merc hadn't exactly done a great deal in the previous 40 years in F1 after that whole incident at Le Mans '55 when the 300 SLR went flying off into the crowd. So how could one say they had the prestige, when quite clearly, the only momentous thing they did since the days of Fangio was throwing down $150K to get the German in the Jordan 191?
On the will to win front, we've been learning the past 17 years that Merc's will to win consists of spending money to buy previously existing operations, and rebadging them with their logos. I don't really consider that a will to win personally. Does the will to win include not coming up with any updates for the W03 since Monaco?
Ah but don't you know, based on the deal Ron the Con agreed to in Frankfurt with a handshake, Lamborghini set about revising the engine to meet the specs that Ayrton Senna wanted?wunderkind wrote:Lamborghini had NO money to develop what was a heavy and unreliable engine at that time. That was the fact Ron was facing. Senna had a foot out the door anyway. The Williams-Renault combo was just superior.SeijaKessen wrote:Actually, were I Ron, I would have entered into the deal with Lamborghini for their V12 engines.wunderkind wrote:
Just think rationally and look at the engine supplier landscape that year and most would probably have reached the same conclusion as Ron did.
Ron could not afford to stick with Peugeot because he was desperate for wins and the Peugeot engine seemed unable to deliver. Of course, the McLaren cars were also to blame. Mercedes was definitely the preferred engine supplier given it's resources, prestige, and will to win.
Why?
Either way he was going to be rolling the dice with a new engine supplier for 1994. But going with Lamborghini likely would have allowed him to retain Ayrton Senna. That would have been the difference maker...besides, they would have had plenty of time to work on the engine to get it up to reliability.
I've got a question regarding that last line though where you mention how Mercedes had prestige and the will to win.
Merc hadn't exactly done a great deal in the previous 40 years in F1 after that whole incident at Le Mans '55 when the 300 SLR went flying off into the crowd. So how could one say they had the prestige, when quite clearly, the only momentous thing they did since the days of Fangio was throwing down $150K to get the German in the Jordan 191?
On the will to win front, we've been learning the past 17 years that Merc's will to win consists of spending money to buy previously existing operations, and rebadging them with their logos. I don't really consider that a will to win personally. Does the will to win include not coming up with any updates for the W03 since Monaco?
In 1994/1995, Merc as it pertains to F1 was no more prestigious than Peugeot.wunderkind wrote:Seijakessen,
If you think Mercedes is no more prestigious than Peugeot, then I have nothing to say. I will not attempt to try to convince you.
Lamborghini was just not a viable option. End of story.